The reductive early conservation test is a permutation test based on the following test statistic.
(1) A set of developmental stages is partitioned into three modules - early, mid, and late - based on prior biological knowledge.
(2) The mean TAI or TDI value for each of the three modules T_early, T_mid, and T_late are computed.
(3) The two differences D1 = T_mid - T_early and D2 = T_late - T_early are calculated.
(4) The minimum D_min of D1 and D2 is computed as final test statistic of the reductive hourglass test.
In order to determine the statistical significance of an observed minimum difference D_min 
the following permutation test was performed. Based on the bootMatrix D_min 
is calculated from each of the permuted TAI or TDI profiles, 
approximated by a Gaussian distribution with method of moments estimated parameters returned by fitdist, 
and the corresponding p-value is computed by pnorm given the estimated parameters of the Gaussian distribution. 
The goodness of fit for the random vector D_min is statistically quantified by an Lilliefors (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) test 
for normality.
In case the parameter plotHistogram = TRUE, a multi-plot is generated showing:
       
(1) A Cullen and Frey skewness-kurtosis plot generated by descdist. 
This plot illustrates which distributions seem plausible to fit the resulting permutation vector D_min. 
In the case of the reductive early conservation test a normal distribution seemed plausible.
(2) A histogram of D_min combined with the density plot is plotted. D_min is then fitted by a normal distribution. 
The corresponding parameters are estimated by moment matching estimation using the fitdist function.
(3) A plot showing the p-values for N independent runs to verify that a specific p-value is biased by a specific permutation order.
(4) A barplot showing the number of cases in which the underlying goodness of fit (returned by Lilliefors (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) test 
for normality) has shown to be significant (TRUE) or not significant (FALSE). 
This allows to quantify the permutation bias and their implications on the goodness of fit.