Kmeasure(X, sigma, edge=TRUE, ..., varcov=NULL)"ppp", or data
    in any format acceptable to as.ppp().varcov.sigma."im",
  see im.object) whose pixel values are estimates
  of the value of the reduced second moment measure for each pixel
  (i.e. estimates of the integral of the second moment density
  over each pixel).The more familiar K-function $K(t)$ is just the value of the reduced second moment measure for each disc centred at the origin; that is, $K(t) = \kappa(b(0,t))$.
An estimate of $\kappa$ derived from a spatial point pattern dataset can be useful in exploratory data analysis. Its advantage over the K-function is that it is also sensitive to anisotropy and directional effects.
  This function computes an estimate of $\kappa$
  from a point pattern dataset X,
  which is assumed to be a realisation of a stationary point process,
  observed inside a known, bounded window. Marks are ignored.
  The algorithm approximates the point pattern and its window by binary pixel
  images, introduces a Gaussian smoothing kernel
  and uses the Fast Fourier Transform fft
  to form a density estimate of $\kappa$. The calculation
  corresponds to the edge correction known as the ``translation
  correction''.
  The Gaussian smoothing kernel may be specified by either of the
  arguments sigma or varcov. If sigma is a single
  number, this specifies an isotropic Gaussian kernel
  with standard deviation sigma on each coordinate axis.
  If sigma is a vector of two numbers, this specifies a Gaussian
  kernel with standard deviation sigma[1] on the $x$ axis,
  standard deviation sigma[2] on the $y$ axis, and zero
  correlation between the $x$ and $y$ axes. If varcov is
  given, this specifies the variance-covariance matrix of the
  Gaussian kernel. There do not seem to be any well-established rules
  for selecting the smoothing kernel in this context.
  
  The density estimate of $\kappa$
  is returned in the form of a real-valued pixel image.
  Pixel values are estimates of the
  integral of the second moment density over the pixel.
  (The uniform Poisson process would have values identically equal to
  $a$ where $a$ is the area of a pixel.)
  Sums of pixel values over a desired region $A$ are estimates of the
  value of $\kappa(A)$. The image x and y
  coordinates are on the same scale as vector displacements in the
  original point pattern window. The point x=0, y=0 corresponds
  to the `typical point'.
  A peak in the image near (0,0) suggests clustering;
  a dip in the image near (0,0) suggests inhibition;
  peaks or dips at other positions suggest possible periodicity.
Stoyan, D. and Stoyan, H. (1994) Fractals, random shapes and point fields: methods of geometrical statistics. John Wiley and Sons.
Kest,
  fryplot,
  spatstat.options,
  im.objectdata(cells)
 image(Kmeasure(cells, 0.05))
 # shows pronounced dip around origin consistent with strong inhibition
 data(redwood)
 image(Kmeasure(redwood, 0.03), col=grey(seq(1,0,length=32)))
 # shows peaks at several places, reflecting clustering and ?periodicityRun the code above in your browser using DataLab