Last chance! 50% off unlimited learning
Sale ends in
bsamsize
you must specify
the fraction of observations in group 1. For power calculations, one
probability (p1
) must be given, and either the other probability (p2
),
an odds.ratio
, or a percent.reduction
must be given. For bpower
or
bsamsize
, any or all of the arguments may be vectors, in which case they
return a vector of powers or sample sizes. All vector arguments must have
the same length.
Given p1, p2
, ballocation
uses the method of Brittain and Schlesselman
to compute the optimal fraction of observations to be placed in group 1
that either (1) minimize the variance of the difference in two proportions,
(2) minimize the variance of the ratio of the two proportions,
(3) minimize the variance of the log odds ratio, or
(4) maximize the power of the 2-tailed test for differences. For (4)
the total sample size must be given, or the fraction optimizing
the power is not returned. The fraction for (3) is one minus the fraction
for (1).
bpower.sim
estimates power by simulations, in minimal time. By using
bpower.sim
you can see that the formulas without any continuity correction
are quite accurate, and that the power of a continuity-corrected test
is significantly lower. That's why no continuity corrections are implemented
here.
bpower(p1, p2, odds.ratio, percent.reduction,
n, n1, n2, alpha=0.05)
bsamsize(p1, p2, fraction=.5, alpha=.05, power=.8)
ballocation(p1, p2, n, alpha=.05)
bpower.sim(p1, p2, odds.ratio, percent.reduction,
n, n1, n2,
alpha=0.05, nsim=10000)
ballocation
, the fraction
which optimizes power will not be
returned.bpower
, if n
is given,
n1
and n2
are set to n/2
.bpower
, the power estimate; for bsamsize
, a vector containing
the sample sizes in the two groups; for ballocation
, a vector with
4 fractions of observations allocated to group 1, optimizing the four
criteria mentioned above. For bpower.sim
, a vector with three
elements is returned, corresponding to the simulated power and its
lower and upper 0.95 confidence limits.Department of Biostatistics
Vanderbilt University
f.harrell@vanderbilt.edu
bpower.sim
, all arguments must be of length one.Brittain E, Schlesselman JJ (1982): Optimal allocation for the comparison of proportions. Biometrics 38:1003--9.
Gordon I, Watson R (1996): The myth of continuity-corrected sample size formulae. Biometrics 52:71--6.
samplesize.bin
, chisq.test
, binconf
bpower(.1, odds.ratio=.9, n=1000, alpha=c(.01,.05))
bpower.sim(.1, odds.ratio=.9, n=1000)
bsamsize(.1, .05, power=.95)
ballocation(.1, .5, n=100)
# Plot power vs. n for various odds ratios (base prob.=.1)
n <- seq(10, 1000, by=10)
OR <- seq(.2,.9,by=.1)
plot(0, 0, xlim=range(n), ylim=c(0,1), xlab="n", ylab="Power", type="n")
for(or in OR) {
lines(n, bpower(.1, odds.ratio=or, n=n))
text(350, bpower(.1, odds.ratio=or, n=350)-.02, format(or))
}
# Another way to plot the same curves, but letting labcurve do the
# work, including labeling each curve at points of maximum separation
pow <- lapply(OR, function(or,n)list(x=n,y=bpower(p1=.1,odds.ratio=or,n=n)),
n=n)
names(pow) <- format(OR)
labcurve(pow, pl=TRUE, xlab='n', ylab='Power')
# Contour graph for various probabilities of outcome in the control
# group, fixing the odds ratio at .8 ([p2/(1-p2) / p1/(1-p1)] = .8)
# n is varied also
p1 <- seq(.01,.99,by=.01)
n <- seq(100,5000,by=250)
pow <- outer(p1, n, function(p1,n) bpower(p1, n=n, odds.ratio=.8))
# This forms a length(p1)*length(n) matrix of power estimates
contour(p1, n, pow)
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab