cca performs correspondence analysis, or optionally
constrained correspondence analysis (a.k.a. canonical correspondence
analysis), or optionally partial constrained correspondence
analysis. Function rda performs redundancy analysis, or
optionally principal components analysis.
These are all very popular ordination techniques in community ecology.## S3 method for class 'formula':
cca(formula, data, na.action = na.fail, subset = NULL,
...)
## S3 method for class 'default':
cca(X, Y, Z, ...)
## S3 method for class 'formula':
rda(formula, data, scale=FALSE, na.action = na.fail,
subset = NULL, ...)
## S3 method for class 'default':
rda(X, Y, Z, scale=FALSE, ...)Condition.TRUE for kept observations, or a logical expression which
can contain variables in the working environment, data or
species names of the community data.print or plot functions
(ignored in other functions).cca returns a huge object of class cca, which
is described separately in cca.object. Function rda returns an object of class rda which
inherits from class cca and is described in cca.object.
The scaling used in rda scores is described in a separate
vignette with this package.
cca and rda are similar to popular
proprietary software Canoco, although the implementation is
completely different. The functions are based on Legendre &
Legendre's (1998) algorithm: in cca
Chi-square transformed data matrix is subjected to weighted linear
regression on constraining variables, and the fitted values are
submitted to correspondence analysis performed via singular value
decomposition (svd). Function rda is similar, but uses
ordinary, unweighted linear regression and unweighted SVD.The functions can be called either with matrix-like entries for community data and constraints, or with formula interface. In general, the formula interface is preferred, because it allows a better control of the model and allows factor constraints.
In the following sections, X, Y and Z, although
referred to as matrices, are more commonly data frames.
In the matrix interface, the
community data matrix X must be given, but the other data
matrices may be omitted, and the corresponding stage of analysis is
skipped. If matrix Z is supplied, its effects are removed from
the community matrix, and the residual matrix is submitted to the next
stage. This is called `partial' correspondence or redundancy
analysis. If matrix
Y is supplied, it is used to constrain the ordination,
resulting in constrained or canonical correspondence analysis, or
redundancy analysis.
Finally, the residual is submitted to ordinary correspondence
analysis (or principal components analysis). If both matrices
Z and Y are missing, the
data matrix is analysed by ordinary correspondence analysis (or
principal components analysis).
Instead of separate matrices, the model can be defined using a model
formula. The left hand side must be the
community data matrix (X). The right hand side defines the
constraining model.
The constraints can contain ordered or unordered factors,
interactions among variables and functions of variables. The defined
contrasts are honoured in factor
variables. The constraints can also be matrices (but not data
frames).
The formula can include a special term Condition
for conditioning variables (``covariables'') ``partialled out'' before
analysis. So the following commands are equivalent: cca(X, Y,
Z), cca(X ~ Y + Condition(Z)), where Y and Z
refer to constraints and conditions matrices respectively.
Constrained correspondence analysis is indeed a constrained method:
CCA does not try to display all variation in the
data, but only the part that can be explained by the used constraints.
Consequently, the results are strongly dependent on the set of
constraints and their transformations or interactions among the
constraints. The shotgun method is to use all environmental variables
as constraints. However, such exploratory problems are better
analysed with
unconstrained methods such as correspondence analysis
(decorana, corresp) or non-metric
multidimensional scaling (metaMDS) and
environmental interpretation after analysis
(envfit, ordisurf).
CCA is a good choice if the user has
clear and strong a priori hypotheses on constraints and is not
interested in the major structure in the data set.
CCA is able to correct the curve artefact commonly found in correspondence analysis by forcing the configuration into linear constraints. However, the curve artefact can be avoided only with a low number of constraints that do not have a curvilinear relation with each other. The curve can reappear even with two badly chosen constraints or a single factor. Although the formula interface makes easy to include polynomial or interaction terms, such terms often produce curved artefacts (that are difficult to interpret), these should probably be avoided.
According to folklore, rda should be used with ``short
gradients'' rather than cca. However, this is not based
on research which finds methods based on Euclidean metric as uniformly
weaker than those based on Chi-squared metric. However, standardized
Euclidean distance may be an appropriate measures (see Hellinger
standardization in decostand in particular).
Partial CCA (pCCA; or alternatively partial RDA) can be used to remove
the effect of some
conditioning or ``background'' or ``random'' variables or
``covariables'' before CCA proper. In fact, pCCA compares models
cca(X ~ Z) and cca(X ~ Y + Z) and attributes their
difference to the effect of Y cleansed of the effect of
Z. Some people have used the method for extracting
``components of variance'' in CCA. However, if the effect of
variables together is stronger than sum of both separately, this can
increase total Chi-square after ``partialling out'' some
variation, and give negative ``components of variance''. In general,
such components of ``variance'' are not to be trusted due to
interactions between two sets of variables.
The functions have summary and plot methods which are
documented separately (see plot.cca, summary.cca).
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical Ecology. 2nd English ed. Elsevier.
McCune, B. (1997) Influence of noisy environmental data on canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 78, 2617-2623. Palmer, M. W. (1993) Putting things in even better order: The advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74,2215-2230. Ter Braak, C. J. F. (1986) Canonical Correspondence Analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67, 1167-1179.
plot.cca and
summary.cca functions
with their helper functions (text.cca,
points.cca, scores.cca).
Function anova.cca provides an ANOVA like permutation
test for the ``significance'' of constraints. Automatic model building
(dangerous!) is discussed in deviance.cca. Diagnostic
tools, prediction and adding new points in ordination are discussed in
goodness.cca and predict.cca.
Function cca (library capscale is a non-Euclidean generalization of
rda. The result object is described in
cca.object.
You can use as.mlm to refit ordination result as a
multiple response linear model to find some descriptive statistics.
Design decisions are explained in
vignette vegandocs.data(varespec)
data(varechem)
## Common but bad way: use all variables you happen to have in your
## environmental data matrix
vare.cca <- cca(varespec, varechem)
vare.cca
plot(vare.cca)
## Formula interface and a better model
vare.cca <- cca(varespec ~ Al + P*(K + Baresoil), data=varechem)
vare.cca
plot(vare.cca)
## `Partialling out' and `negative components of variance'
cca(varespec ~ Ca, varechem)
cca(varespec ~ Ca + Condition(pH), varechem)
## RDA
data(dune)
data(dune.env)
dune.Manure <- rda(dune ~ Manure, dune.env)
plot(dune.Manure)
## For further documentation:
vegandocs("decision")Run the code above in your browser using DataLab