metabias(x, seTE, TE.fixed, seTE.fixed,
method = "rank",
plotit = FALSE, correct = FALSE)
meta
, or estimated treatment
effect in individual studies.x
not of class meta
).x
not
of class meta
and method
= "rank"
).x
not of class meta
and method
=
"rank"
)."rank"
, "linreg"
, "mm"
or
"count"
, can be abbreviated."rank"
, "linreg"
or "mm"
."rank"
and "count"
."htest"
containing the following components:"ks"
or "bias"
corresponding to the method
employed, i.e., rank correlation or regression method.0
.method
is "rank"
, the test statistic is based on the
rank correlation between standardised treatment estimates and variance
estimates of estimated treatment effects; Kendall's tau is used as
correlation measure (Begg & Mazumdar, 1994). The test statistic
follows a standard normal distribution. By default (if correct
is FALSE), no continuity correction is utilised (Kendall & Gibbons,
1990).
If method
is "linreg"
, the test statistic is based on a
linear regression of the standardised treatment effect (standard
normal deviate) on the inverse of the standard error of the treatment
estimate (Egger et al., 1997). The test statistic follows a t
distribution with number of studies - 2
degrees of freedom.
If method
is "mm"
, the test statistic is based on a
weighted linear regression using the method of moments estimator of
the additive between-study variance component (method 3a in Thompson,
Sharp, 1999). The test statistic follows a t distribution with
number of studies - 2
degrees of freedom. If method
is "count"
, the test statistic is based on the
rank correlation between a standardised cell frequency and the inverse
of the variance of the cell frequency; Kendall's tau is used as
correlation measure (Schwarzer, 2003). The test statistic
follows a standard normal distribution. By default (if correct
is FALSE), no continuity correction is utilised (Kendall & Gibbons,
1990).
Kendall M & Gibbons JD (1990), Rank Correlation Methods. London: Edward Arnold.
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M & Minder C (1997), Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629--634.
Schwarzer G (2003), Statistical Tests for Bias in Meta-Analysis with Binary Outcomes, PhD thesis, University of Dortmund, Germany, http://eldorado.uni-dortmund.de
Thompson SG, Sharp, SJ (1999), Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods, Statistics in Medicine, 18, 2693--2708.
funnel
, metabin
, metacont
, metagen
data(Olkin95)
meta1 <- metabin(event.e, n.e, event.c, n.c,
data=Olkin95, subset=c(41,47,51,59),
sm="RR", meth="I")
metabias(meta1)
metabias(meta1, correct=TRUE)
metabias(meta1, method="linreg")
metabias(meta1, method="linreg", plotit=TRUE)
metabias(meta1, method="count")
##
## Same result:
##
metabias(meta1, method="linreg")$p.value
metabias(meta1$TE, meta1$seTE, method="linreg")$p.value
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab