metabias(x, seTE, TE.fixed, seTE.fixed,
method = "rank",
plotit = FALSE, correct = FALSE)meta, or estimated treatment
effect in individual studies.x not of class meta).x not
of class meta and method = "rank").x not of class meta and method =
"rank")."rank", "linreg", "mm" or
"count", can be abbreviated."rank", "linreg" or "mm"."rank" and "count"."htest" containing the following components:"ks" or "bias" corresponding to the method
employed, i.e., rank correlation or regression method.0.method is "rank", the test statistic is based on the
rank correlation between standardised treatment estimates and variance
estimates of estimated treatment effects; Kendall's tau is used as
correlation measure (Begg & Mazumdar, 1994). The test statistic
follows a standard normal distribution. By default (if correct
is FALSE), no continuity correction is utilised (Kendall & Gibbons,
1990).
If method is "linreg", the test statistic is based on a
linear regression of the standardised treatment effect (standard
normal deviate) on the inverse of the standard error of the treatment
estimate (Egger et al., 1997). The test statistic follows a t
distribution with number of studies - 2 degrees of freedom.
If method is "mm", the test statistic is based on a
weighted linear regression using the method of moments estimator of
the additive between-study variance component (method 3a in Thompson,
Sharp, 1999). The test statistic follows a t distribution with
number of studies - 2 degrees of freedom. If method is "count", the test statistic is based on the
rank correlation between a standardised cell frequency and the inverse
of the variance of the cell frequency; Kendall's tau is used as
correlation measure (Schwarzer, 2003). The test statistic
follows a standard normal distribution. By default (if correct
is FALSE), no continuity correction is utilised (Kendall & Gibbons,
1990).
Kendall M & Gibbons JD (1990), Rank Correlation Methods. London: Edward Arnold.
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M & Minder C (1997), Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629--634.
Schwarzer G (2003), Statistical Tests for Bias in Meta-Analysis with Binary Outcomes, PhD thesis, University of Dortmund, Germany, http://eldorado.uni-dortmund.de
Thompson SG, Sharp, SJ (1999), Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods, Statistics in Medicine, 18, 2693--2708.
funnel, metabin, metacont, metagendata(Olkin95)
meta1 <- metabin(event.e, n.e, event.c, n.c,
data=Olkin95, subset=c(41,47,51,59),
sm="RR", meth="I")
metabias(meta1)
metabias(meta1, correct=TRUE)
metabias(meta1, method="linreg")
metabias(meta1, method="linreg", plotit=TRUE)
metabias(meta1, method="count")
##
## Same result:
##
metabias(meta1, method="linreg")$p.value
metabias(meta1$TE, meta1$seTE, method="linreg")$p.valueRun the code above in your browser using DataLab