DMwR (version 0.4.1)

regr.eval: Calculate Some Standard Regression Evaluation Statistics

Description

This function is able to calculate a series of regression evaluation statistics given two vectors: one with the true target variable values, and the other with the predicted target variable values.

Usage

regr.eval(trues, preds, stats = if (is.null(train.y)) c("mae","mse","rmse","mape") else c("mae","mse","rmse","mape","nmse","nmae"), train.y = NULL)

Arguments

trues

A numeric vector with the true values of the target variable.

preds

A numeric vector with the predicted values of the target variable.

stats

A vector with the names of the evaluation statistics to calculate. Possible values are "mae", "mse", "rmse", "mape", "nmse" or "nmae". The two latter require that the parameter train.y contains a numeric vector of target variable values (see below).

train.y

In case the set of statistics to calculate include either "nmse" or "nmae", this parameter should contain a numeric vector with the values of the target variable on the set of data used to obtain the model whose performance is being tested.

Value

A named vector with the calculated statistics.

Details

The regression evaluation statistics calculated by this function belong to two different groups of measures: absolute and relative. The former include "mae", "mse", and "rmse" and are calculated as follows:

"mae": mean absolute error, which is calculated as sum(|t_i - p_i|)/N, where t's are the true values and p's are the predictions, while N is supposed to be the size of both vectors.

"mse": mean squared error, which is calculated as sum( (t_i - p_i)^2 )/N

"rmse": root mean squared error that is calculated as sqrt(mse)

The remaining measures ("mape", "nmse" and "nmae") are relative measures, the two later comparing the performance of the model with a baseline. They are unit-less measures with values always greater than 0. In the case of "nmse" and "nmae" the values are expected to be in the interval [0,1] though occasionaly scores can overcome 1, which means that your model is performing worse than the baseline model. The baseline used in our implementation is a constant model that always predicts the average target variable value, estimated using the values of this variable on the training data (data used to obtain the model that generated the predictions), which should be given in the parameter train.y. The relative error measure "mape" does not require a baseline. It simply calculates the average percentage difference between the true values and the predictions.

These measures are calculated as follows:

"mape": sum(|(t_i - p_i) / t_i|)/N

"nmse": sum( (t_i - p_i)^2 ) / sum( (t_i - AVG(Y))^2 ), where AVG(Y) is the average of the values provided in vector train.y

"nmae": sum(|t_i - p_i|) / sum(|t_i - AVG(Y)|)

References

Torgo, L. (2010) Data Mining using R: learning with case studies, CRC Press (ISBN: 9781439810187).

http://www.dcc.fc.up.pt/~ltorgo/DataMiningWithR

See Also

class.eval

Examples

## Calculating several statistics of a regression tree on the Swiss data
data(swiss)
idx <- sample(1:nrow(swiss),as.integer(0.7*nrow(swiss)))
train <- swiss[idx,]
test <- swiss[-idx,]
library(rpart)
model <- rpart(Infant.Mortality ~ .,train)
preds <- predict(model,test)
## calculate mae and rmse
regr.eval(test[,'Infant.Mortality'],preds,stats=c('mae','rmse'))
## calculate all statistics
regr.eval(test[,'Infant.Mortality'],preds,train.y=train[,'Infant.Mortality'])