This function generates a sample from the posterior distribution of a Poisson regression model with multiple changepoints. The function uses the Markov chain Monte Carlo method of Chib (1998). The user supplies data and priors, and a sample from the posterior distribution is returned as an mcmc object, which can be subsequently analyzed with functions provided in the coda package.
MCMCpoissonChange(formula, data = parent.frame(), m = 1, b0 = 0, B0 = 1,
a = NULL, b = NULL, c0 = NA, d0 = NA, lambda.mu = NA,
lambda.var = NA, burnin = 1000, mcmc = 1000, thin = 1, verbose = 0,
seed = NA, beta.start = NA, P.start = NA,
marginal.likelihood = c("none", "Chib95"), ...)
Model formula.
Data frame.
The number of changepoints.
The prior mean of
The prior precision of
The mean of the Gamma prior on
The variacne of the Gamma prior on
The number of burn-in iterations for the sampler.
The number of MCMC iterations after burn-in.
The thinning interval used in the simulation. The number of MCMC iterations must be divisible by this value.
A switch which determines whether or not the progress of the
sampler is printed to the screen. If verbose
is greater than 0, the
iteration number and the posterior density samples are printed to the screen
every verbose
th iteration.
The seed for the random number generator. If NA, current R system seed is used.
The starting values for the beta vector. This can either be a scalar or a column vector with dimension equal to the number of betas. The default value of NA will use draws from the Uniform distribution with the same boundary with the data as the starting value. If this is a scalar, that value will serve as the starting value mean for all of the betas. When there is no covariate, the log value of means should be used.
The starting values for the transition matrix. A user should
provide a square matrix with dimension equal to the number of states. By
default, draws from the Beta(0.9, 0.1)
are used to construct a proper
transition matrix for each raw except the last raw.
How should the marginal likelihood be calculated?
Options are: none
in which case the marginal likelihood will not be
calculated, and Chib95
in which case the method of Chib (1995) is
used.
further arguments to be passed
An mcmc object that contains the posterior sample. This object can
be summarized by functions provided by the coda package. The object
contains an attribute prob.state
storage matrix that contains the
probability of logmarglike
).
MCMCpoissonChange
simulates from the posterior distribution of a
Poisson regression model with multiple changepoints using the methods of
Chib (1998) and Fruhwirth-Schnatter and Wagner (2006). The details of the
model are discussed in Park (2010).
The model takes the following form:
Where
We assume Gaussian distribution for prior of
And:
Jong Hee Park. 2010. ``Structural Change in the U.S. Presidents' Use of Force Abroad.'' American Journal of Political Science 54: 766-782.
Sylvia Fruhwirth-Schnatter and Helga Wagner 2006. ``Auxiliary Mixture Sampling for Parameter-driven Models of Time Series of Counts with Applications to State Space Modelling.'' Biometrika. 93:827--841.
Siddhartha Chib. 1998. ``Estimation and comparison of multiple change-point models.'' Journal of Econometrics. 86: 221-241.
Andrew D. Martin, Kevin M. Quinn, and Jong Hee Park. 2011. ``MCMCpack: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in R.'', Journal of Statistical Software. 42(9): 1-21. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v42/i09/.
Siddhartha Chib. 1995. ``Marginal Likelihood from the Gibbs Output.'' Journal of the American Statistical Association. 90: 1313-1321.
# NOT RUN {
# }
# NOT RUN {
set.seed(11119)
n <- 150
x1 <- runif(n, 0, 0.5)
true.beta1 <- c(1, 1)
true.beta2 <- c(1, -2)
true.beta3 <- c(1, 2)
## set true two breaks at (50, 100)
true.s <- rep(1:3, each=n/3)
mu1 <- exp(1 + x1[true.s==1]*1)
mu2 <- exp(1 + x1[true.s==2]*-2)
mu3 <- exp(1 + x1[true.s==3]*2)
y <- as.ts(c(rpois(n/3, mu1), rpois(n/3, mu2), rpois(n/3, mu3)))
formula = y ~ x1
## fit multiple models with a varying number of breaks
model0 <- MCMCpoissonChange(formula, m=0,
mcmc = 1000, burnin = 1000, verbose = 500,
b0 = rep(0, 2), B0 = 5*diag(2), marginal.likelihood = "Chib95")
model1 <- MCMCpoissonChange(formula, m=1,
mcmc = 1000, burnin = 1000, verbose = 500,
b0 = rep(0, 2), B0 = 5*diag(2), marginal.likelihood = "Chib95")
model2 <- MCMCpoissonChange(formula, m=2,
mcmc = 1000, burnin = 1000, verbose = 500,
b0 = rep(0, 2), B0 = 5*diag(2), marginal.likelihood = "Chib95")
model3 <- MCMCpoissonChange(formula, m=3,
mcmc = 1000, burnin = 1000, verbose = 500,
b0 = rep(0, 2), B0 = 5*diag(2), marginal.likelihood = "Chib95")
model4 <- MCMCpoissonChange(formula, m=4,
mcmc = 1000, burnin = 1000, verbose = 500,
b0 = rep(0, 2), B0 = 5*diag(2), marginal.likelihood = "Chib95")
model5 <- MCMCpoissonChange(formula, m=5,
mcmc = 1000, burnin = 1000, verbose = 500,
b0 = rep(0, 2), B0 = 5*diag(2), marginal.likelihood = "Chib95")
## find the most reasonable one
print(BayesFactor(model0, model1, model2, model3, model4, model5))
## draw plots using the "right" model
par(mfrow=c(attr(model2, "m") + 1, 1), mai=c(0.4, 0.6, 0.3, 0.05))
plotState(model2, legend.control = c(1, 0.6))
plotChangepoint(model2, verbose = TRUE, ylab="Density", start=1, overlay=TRUE)
## No covariate case
model2.1 <- MCMCpoissonChange(y ~ 1, m = 2, c0 = 2, d0 = 1,
mcmc = 1000, burnin = 1000, verbose = 500,
marginal.likelihood = "Chib95")
print(BayesFactor(model2, model2.1))
# }
# NOT RUN {
# }
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab