# The following example is derived from the
# "mix2_data" dataset, included in the MOTE library.
# Given previous research, we know that backward strength in free
# association tends to increase the ratings participants give when
# you ask them how many people out of 100 would say a word in
# response to a target word (like Family Feud). This result is
# tied to people’s overestimation of how well they think they know
# something, which is bad for studying. So, we gave people instructions
# on how to ignore the BSG. Did it help? Is there an interaction
# between BSG and instructions given?
# You would calculate one partial GES value for each F-statistic.
# Here's an example for the interaction using reported ANOVA values.
ges_partial_ss_mix(dfm = 1, dfe = 156,
ssm = 71.07608,
sss = 30936.498,
sse = 8657.094,
f_value = 1.280784, a = .05)
# Backwards-compatible dotted name (deprecated)
ges.partial.SS.mix(dfm = 1, dfe = 156,
ssm = 71.07608,
sss = 30936.498,
sse = 8657.094,
Fvalue = 1.280784, a = .05)
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab