The fit of an N-factor models theoretical volatility term structure of futures returns to those obtained directly from observed futures prices can be used as a measure of robustness for
the models ability to explain the behaviour of a commodities term structure.
The theoretical model volatility term structure of futures returns is given by the following equation:
_F() = _i=1^N _j=1^N _i _j _i,j e^-(_i + _j)sigma_F(tau) = sum_i = 1, j = 1^N sigma[i] sigma[j] rho[i,j] e^(-(kappa[i] + kappa[j]) tau)
Under the case that _1 = 0kappa[1] = 0, the model volatility term structure converges to _1^2sigma[1]^2 as tau grows large.
The empirical volatility term structure of futures returns is given by:
_F^2() = 1 t_i=1^N(log(F(t_i,)/F(t_i- t,)) - )^2hat(sigma)[F^2](tau) = 1/(Delta * t) sum_i=1^N (log(F(t[i],tau) / F(t[i] - Delta t, tau)) - bar(mu))^2
According to Cortazar and Naranjo (2006): "A larger number of factors gives more flexibility to adjust first and second moments simultaneously, hence explaining why (a) four-factor (may) outperform (a) three-factor one in fitting the volatility term structure."