# NOT RUN {
## The test cases have been taken directly from David Firths MEXP package.
##
##
## ----------------------------
## Test case 1 from Ward (1977)
## ----------------------------
test1 <- t(matrix(c(
4, 2, 0,
1, 4, 1,
1, 1, 4), 3, 3))
matexp(test1)
## Results on Power Mac G3 under Mac OS 10.2.8
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
## [1,] 147.86662244637000 183.76513864636857 71.79703239999643
## [2,] 127.78108552318250 183.76513864636877 91.88256932318409
## [3,] 127.78108552318204 163.67960172318047 111.96810624637124
## -- these agree with ward (1977, p608)
##
## A naive alternative to mexp, using spectral decomposition:
mexp2 <- function(matrix){
z <- eigen(matrix,sym=FALSE)
Re(z$vectors %*% diag(exp(z$values)) %*%
solve(z$vectors))
}
try(mexp2(test1))
## now gives an error from solve !
##
## older result was
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
##[1,] 147.86662244637003 88.500223574029647 103.39983337000028
##[2,] 127.78108552318220 117.345806155250600 90.70416537273444
##[3,] 127.78108552318226 90.384173332156763 117.66579819582827
## -- hopelessly inaccurate in all but the first column.
##
##
## ----------------------------
## Test case 2 from Ward (1977)
## ----------------------------
test2 <- t(matrix(c(
29.87942128909879, .7815750847907159, -2.289519314033932,
.7815750847907159, 25.72656945571064, 8.680737820540137,
-2.289519314033932, 8.680737820540137, 34.39400925519054),
3, 3))
matexp(test2)
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
##[1,] 5496313853692357 -18231880972009844 -30475770808580828
##[2,] -18231880972009852 60605228702227024 101291842930256144
##[3,] -30475770808580840 101291842930256144 169294411240859072
## -- which agrees with Ward (1977) to 13 significant figures
mexp2(test2)
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
##[1,] 5496313853692405 -18231880972009100 -30475770808580196
##[2,] -18231880972009160 60605228702221760 101291842930249376
##[3,] -30475770808580244 101291842930249200 169294411240850880
## -- in this case a very similar degree of accuracy.
##
## ----------------------------
## Test case 3 from Ward (1977)
## ----------------------------
test3 <- t(matrix(c(
-131, 19, 18,
-390, 56, 54,
-387, 57, 52), 3, 3))
matexp(test3)
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
##[1,] -1.5096441587713636 0.36787943910439874 0.13533528117301735
##[2,] -5.6325707997970271 1.47151775847745725 0.40600584351567010
##[3,] -4.9349383260294299 1.10363831731417195 0.54134112675653534
## -- agrees to 10dp with Ward (1977), p608.
mexp2(test3)
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
##[1,] -1.509644158796182 0.3678794391103086 0.13533528117547022
##[2,] -5.632570799902948 1.4715177585023838 0.40600584352641989
##[3,] -4.934938326098410 1.1036383173309319 0.54134112676302582
## -- in this case, a similar level of agreement with Ward (1977).
##
# }
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab