format
This data frame contains 30 rows (cases) and the following 9 columns (variables):
rlll{
[ , 1] AU outcome: local autonomy
("1" always, "0" never)
[ , 2] EM condition: local communal involvement through direct employment
("1" 100 percent, "0" 0 percent)
[ , 3] SP condition: local direct spending
("1" always, "0" never)
[ , 4] CO condition: co-management with local or regional stakeholders
("1" present, "0" absent)
[ , 5] CI condition: degree of influence of national civil service policies
("1" 100 percent civil service employees, "0" 0 percent)
[ , 6] PO condition: national participation in policy-making
("1" perceived programme influence, "0" no perceived influence)
[ , 7] RE condition: research-oriented partnerships
("1" many, "0" few)
[ , 8] CN condition: conservation-oriented partnerships
("1" many, "0" few)
[ , 9] DE condition: direct support by development organizations
("1" always, "0" never)
}source
Basurto, Xavier. 2013. Linking Multi-Level Governance to Local Common-Pool
Resource Theory using Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Insights from
Twenty Years of Biodiversity Conservation in Costa Rica.
Global Environmental Change 23 (3):573-87.