This data set was used by Cebotari and Vink (2013), and it was taken here from the associated replication file Cebotari and Vink (2015).
data(CVR)
data(CVF)A data frame containing 29 cases (ethnic minorities) and the following 6 columns:
|
Level of democracy: (contextual factor), based on a democracy index ranking countries |
| on a scale from strong autocracies (0) to strong democracies (10). The fuzzy scores were | |
| calibrated using an exclusion threshold of 2, a crossover of 7 and an inclusion | |
| threshold of 9.5. | |
|
Degree of ethnic fractionalization: (contextual factor), with raw scores ranging from a |
| homogenous society (0) to a highly fragmented country (1). The fuzzy scores were | |
| calibrated using an exclusion threshold of 0, a crossover of 0.495 and an inclusion | |
| threshold of 0.8. | |
|
Territorial concentration: (group-related factor) with raw data coded as: widely |
| dispersed (0) and primarily urban minorities (1) considered territorially dispersed | |
| minorities, and ethnic comunities majoritary in a region (2) and entirely concentrated | |
| in one region (3) considered as territorially concentrated minorities. The fuzzy scores | |
| were calibrated using an exclusion threshold of 0, a crossover of 1.25 and an inclusion | |
| threshold of 3. | |
|
Political discrimination: (group-related factor) captures discrimination practices |
| toward minority groups that vary from no discrimination (0) to exclusive and repressive | |
| policies toward a minority group (4). The fuzzy scores were calibrated using an exclusion | |
| threshold of 0, a crossover of 0.75 and an inclusion threshold of 3. | |
|
National pride: (group-related factor) with raw scores ranging from |
| ‘not at all proud’ (0) to ‘very proud’ (3). The fuzzy scores were calibrated using | |
| an exclusion threshold of 0.5, a crossover of 1.5 and an inclusion threshold of 2.5. | |
|
Outcome, ethnopolitical protest: measured on a range from 0 to 5 with higher values |
| indicating more intense protest actions. The fuzzy scores were calibrated using an | |
| exclusion threshold of 0.5, a crossover of 1.5 and an inclusion threshold of 3. |
There are two different versions of the Cebotari and Vink data: CVR contains
the raw data, and CVF contains the data calibrated to fuzzy-sets.
Cebotari, V.; Vink, M.P. (2013) “A Configurational Analysis of Ethnic Protest in Europe”. International Journal of Comparative Sociology vol.54, no.4, pp.298-324.
Cebotari, V.; Vink, M.P. (2015) “Replication Data for: A configurational analysis of ethnic protest in Europe”, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PT2IB9, Harvard Dataverse, V2