This is referred to in the book as the "DOB1" dataset. Dobbins et al conducted a multi-institutional, MRMC study to compare the performance of digital tomosynthesis (GE's VolumeRad device), dual-energy (DE) imaging, and conventional chest radiography for pulmonary nodule detection and management. All study images were obtained with a flat-panel detector developed by GE. The case set consisted of 158 subjects, of which 43 were non-diseased and the rest had 1 - 20 pulmonary nodules independently verified, using with CT images, by 3 experts who did not participate in the observer study. The study used FROC paradigm data collection. There are 4 modalities labeled 1 - 4 (conventional chest x-ray, CXR, CXR augmented with dual-energy (CXR+DE), VolumeRad digital tomosynthesis images and VolumeRad augmented with DE (VolumeRad+DE).
dataset11
A list with 8 elements:
NL
Ratings array [1:4, 1:5, 1:158, 1:4], of non-lesion localizations, NLs
LL
Ratings array [1:4, 1:5, 1:115, 1:20], of lesion localizations, LLs
lesionNum
array [1:115], number of lesions per diseased case
lesionID
array [1:115, 20], labels of lesions on diseased cases, all set to 1
lesionWeight
array [1:115, 20] weights (or clinical importance) of lesions, all set to 1
dataType
"FROC", the data type
modalityID
[1:4] "1" "2" ..., modality labels
readerID
[1:5] "1" "2" ..., reader labels
Dobbins III JT et al. Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Digital Tomosynthesis, Dual-Energy Radiography, and Conventional Chest Radiography for the Detection and Management of Pulmonary Nodules. Radiology. 2016;282(1):236-250.
# NOT RUN {
str(dataset11)
# }
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab