Data frame with segments (x-axis) and tops(y-axis).
x
x coordinates of all priors.
y
y coordinates of all priors.
boundary
Boundary line function of one argument, eg. boundary=function(x) {5.0067*exp(-0.664*x)}
rsq
R square of the fit.
criteria
Threshold for detection of moderate release
criteria2
Threshold for detection of major release.
store
If to save results on files.
storedev
Format for saving the graphical outputs, eg. pdf or jpeg.
prefix
Prefix of saved files.
Author
Pavel Fibich <pavel.fibich@prf.jcu.cz>, Jan Altman <altman.jan@gmail.com>, Tuomas Aakala <tuomas.aakala@helsinki.fi>, Jiri Dolezal <jiriddolezal@gmail.com>
Details
Boundary-line method scales the percent growth change of Nowacki & Abrams (1997) according to growth rate prior to disturbance. In their example, Black & Abrams (2003) defined moderate and major releases as those falling within 20-49.9%, and 50-100% of the boundary line, respectively. Advantage of the boundary-line is standardization, which takes into account the relationships among tree age, size, and canopy class determining radial growth rate (Black et al. 2004). On the downside, Black et al. (2009) suggest approximately 50000 ring width measurements is necessary for boundary line determination for a given species (Black et al. 2009).
References
Altman J, Fibich P, Dolezal J & Aakala T (2014) TRADER: a package for Tree Ring Analysis of Disturbance Events in R. Dendrochonologia 32: 107-112.