dat.whiting

This dataset serves as an example of meta-analysis of (log) odds ratios.

dataset

Provides alternative statistical methods for meta-analysis, including:
- bivariate generalized linear mixed models for synthesizing odds ratios, relative risks,
and risk differences
(Chu et al., 2012 <doi:10.1177/0962280210393712>)
- tests and measures for between-study heterogeneity
(Lin et al., 2017 <doi:10.1111/biom.12543>;
Wang et al., 2022 <doi:10.1002/sim.9261>);
- measures, tests, and visualization tools for publication bias or small-study effects
(Lin and Chu, 2018 <doi:10.1111/biom.12817>;
Lin, 2019 <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1340>;
Lin, 2020 <doi:10.1177/0962280220910172>;
Shi et al., 2020 <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1415>);
- meta-analysis of combining standardized mean differences and odds ratios
(Jing et al., 2023 <doi:10.1080/10543406.2022.2105345>);
- meta-analysis of diagnostic tests for synthesizing sensitivities, specificities, etc.
(Reitsma et al., 2005 <doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022>;
Chu and Cole, 2006 <doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.011>);
- meta-analysis methods for synthesizing proportions
(Lin and Chu, 2020 <doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000001232>);
- models for multivariate meta-analysis, measures of inconsistency degrees of freedom
in Bayesian network meta-analysis, and predictive P-score
(Lin and Chu, 2018 <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1293>;
Lin, 2020 <doi:10.1080/10543406.2020.1852247>;
Rosenberger et al., 2021 <doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01397-5>).

Lifeng Lin

altmeta

Alternative Meta-Analysis Methods

Yaqi Jing

Kristine J. Rosenberger

Linyu Shi

Yipeng Wang

Xing Xing

Zhiyuan Yu

Haitao Chu

dat.whiting function

A data frame with 29 studies with the following 9 variables within each study.<dl>
 <dt><code>y</code></dt>
<dd>point esimates of log odds ratios.</dd> <dt><code>s2</code></dt>
<dd>sample variances of log odds ratios.</dd> <dt><code>n00</code></dt>
<dd>counts of non-events in treatment group 0 (placebo).</dd> <dt><code>n01</code></dt>
<dd>counts of events in treatment group 0.</dd> <dt><code>n10</code></dt>
<dd>counts of non-events in treatment group 1 (cannabinoid).</dd> <dt><code>n11</code></dt>
<dd>counts of events in treatment group 1 (cannabinoid).</dd> <dt><code>n0</code></dt>
<dd>sample sizes in treatment group 0.</dd> <dt><code>n1</code></dt>
<dd>sample sizes in treatment group 1.</dd> <dt><code>n</code></dt>
<dd>total sample sizes.</dd> 
</dl>

Format

A Meta-Analysis on Adverse Events for the Comparison Cannabinoid vs. Placebo — dat.whiting

A data frame with 29 studies with the following 9 variables within each study.<dl>
 <dt><code>y</code></dt>
<dd>point esimates of log odds ratios.</dd>

 <dt><code>s2</code></dt>
<dd>sample variances of log odds ratios.</dd>

 <dt><code>n00</code></dt>
<dd>counts of non-events in treatment group 0 (placebo).</dd>

 <dt><code>n01</code></dt>
<dd>counts of events in treatment group 0.</dd>

 <dt><code>n10</code></dt>
<dd>counts of non-events in treatment group 1 (cannabinoid).</dd>

 <dt><code>n11</code></dt>
<dd>counts of events in treatment group 1 (cannabinoid).</dd>

 <dt><code>n0</code></dt>
<dd>sample sizes in treatment group 0.</dd>

 <dt><code>n1</code></dt>
<dd>sample sizes in treatment group 1.</dd>

 <dt><code>n</code></dt>
<dd>total sample sizes.</dd>

 
</dl>

A Meta-Analysis on Adverse Events for the Comparison Cannabinoid vs. Placebo

dat.whiting: A Meta-Analysis on Adverse Events for the Comparison Cannabinoid vs. Placebo

Description

Usage

Arguments

Format