
Last chance! 50% off unlimited learning
Sale ends in
ces(prices,shares,margins,
ownerPre,ownerPost,
shareInside = 1,
normIndex=ifelse(sum(shares)
nleqslv
optimizer used to solve for equilibrium pricesces
returns an instance of class CES
.
ces.nests
returns an instance of CESNests
, a
child class of CES .
ces
is able to
recover the price coefficient and product mean valuations in a
Constant Elasticity of Substitution demand model. ces
then uses these
calibrated parameters to simulate the price effects of a merger between two firms under the
assumption that that all firms in the market are playing a
differentiated products Bertrand pricing game.
ces.nests
is identical to ces
except that it includes the `nests'
argument which may be used to assign products to different
nests. Nests are useful because they allow for richer substitution
patterns between products. Products within the same nest are assumed
to be closer substitutes than products in different nests. The degree
of substitutability between products located in different nests is
controlled by the value of the nesting parameter sigma.
The nesting parameters for singleton nests (nests containing
only one product) are not identified and normalized to 1. The vector of
sigmas is calibrated from the prices, revenue shares, and margins supplied
by the user.
By default, all non-singleton nests are assumed to have a common value for sigma.
This constraint may be relaxed by setting `constraint' to
FALSE. In this case, at least one product margin must be supplied from
a product within each nest.
In both ces
and ces.nests
, if revenue shares sum to 1,
then one product's mean value is not identified and must be normalized
to 1. `normIndex' may be used to specify the index (position) of the
product whose mean value is to be normalized. If the sum of revenue shares
is less than 1, both of these functions assume that the exists a k+1st
product in the market whose price and mean value are both normalized
to 1.logit
## Calibration and simulation results from a merger between Budweiser and
## Old Style. Assume that typical consumer spends 1% of income on beer,
## and that total beer expenditure in US is 1e9
## Source: Epstein/Rubenfeld 2004, pg 80
prodNames <- c("BUD","OLD STYLE","MILLER","MILLER-LITE","OTHER-LITE","OTHER-REG")
ownerPre <-c("BUD","OLD STYLE","MILLER","MILLER","OTHER-LITE","OTHER-REG")
ownerPost <-c("BUD","BUD","MILLER","MILLER","OTHER-LITE","OTHER-REG")
nests <- c("R","R","R","L","L","R")
price <- c(.0441,.0328,.0409,.0396,.0387,.0497)
shares <- c(.071,.137,.251,.179,.093,.269)
margins <- c(.3830,.5515,.5421,.5557,.4453,.3769)
names(price) <-
names(shares) <-
names(margins) <-
prodNames
result.ces <-ces(price,shares,margins,ownerPre=ownerPre,ownerPost=ownerPost,
shareInside=.01,labels=prodNames)
print(result.ces) # return predicted price change
summary(result.ces) # summarize merger simulation
elast(result.ces,TRUE) # returns premerger elasticities
elast(result.ces,FALSE) # returns postmerger elasticities
diversion(result.ces,TRUE) # return premerger diversion ratios
diversion(result.ces,FALSE) # return postmerger diversion ratios
cmcr(result.ces) #calculate compensating marginal cost reduction
upp(result.ces) #calculate Upwards Pricing Pressure Index
CV(result.ces) #calculate compensating variation as a percent of
#representative consumer income
CV(result.ces,1e9) #calculate compensating variation in dollars
#1e9 is an estimate of total US beer expenditure
## Implement the Hypothetical Monopolist Test
## for BUD and OLD STYLE using a 5\% SSNIP
HypoMonTest(result.ces,prodIndex=1:2)
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab