Sometimes estimation of the model parameters is difficult,
always check the convergence of the optimisation algorithm. The
asymmetric Laplace model, effect.family="alaplace", is often more
difficult to optimise than effect.family="gaussian".If your data is standardised (having general mean zero and general variance one) the
loglikelihood function is usually maximised over values between -5 and 5.
The transformed.par is a vector of transformed model parameters
having length 5 up to 7 depending on the chosen model.
The transformed.par is $(\log \sigma^2,\log \sigma_\eta^2, \log
\sigma_\theta^2,\mu, \mathrm{logit} p,\mathrm{logit} q )$ a vector of length 6 when using effect.family = "gaussian" and var.select=TRUE,
and is $(\log
\sigma^2,\log \sigma_\eta^2,\log \sigma_{\theta_L}^2,\log \sigma_{\theta_R}^2,\mu,
\mathrm{logit} p, \mathrm{logit} q)$ a vector of length 7
for effect.family="alaplace" and var.select=TRUE.
When var.select=FALSE the $q$ parameter is dropped, yielding a vector
of length 5 for
effect.family="gaussian" and a vector of length 6
for effect.family="alaplace".
We assumed a Bayesian linear model being $$y_{vctr}=\mu+\eta_{vct}+\delta_v \gamma_{vc}\theta_{vc}+\varepsilon_{vctr}$$ where $y_{vctr}$ is the available data on variable $v$,
cluster(or class) $c$, type $t$, and replicate $r$; $\eta_{vct}$
is the between-type error, $\theta_{vc}$ is the disappearing random component controlled by the Bernoulli variables $\delta_v$ with success probability $q$ and $\gamma_{vc}$ with
success probability $p$; and $\varepsilon_{vctr}$ is the between-replicate error. The types inside a cluster (or class) share the same $\theta_{vc}$, but may arise with a different $\eta_{vct}$.
The model parameters has natural interpretations, $\sigma^2$ is the
between replicate error variance; $\sigma^2_\eta$ is the variance of
between-type error; $\sigma^2_\theta$ is the variance of
the disappearing random component which is decomposed to
$\sigma^2_{\theta_L}$, $\sigma^2_{\theta_R}$ the left and the right tail
variances if the model is asymmetric Laplace; $\mu$ is the general
level; $p$ is the proportion of active variable-cluster (or variable-class) combinations, and
$q$ is the proportion of the active variables.