Learn R Programming

bnRep (version 0.0.3)

suffocation: suffocation Bayesian Network

Description

Human-related hazardous events assessment for suffocation on ships by integrating Bayesian network and complex network.

Arguments

Value

An object of class bn.fit. Refer to the documentation of bnlearn for details.

Format

A Gaussian Bayesian network to investigate the human-related factors associated with suffocation on ships during docking repair. The probabilities were given within the referenced paper. The vertices are:

N4

The safety supervisor on board the ship did not perceive the unsafe actions of the operators and failed to correct the inappropriate operations;

N5

The representative of the ship owner was absent during the operation;

N8

Nitrogen leakage

N10

The safety management department of the shipyard failed to strictly implement all safety measures during the holiday season;

N11

The safety management department of the shipyard did not attach great importance to the safety of the operation on site, and the safety issues were not paid much attention;

N12

The quality management system in the safety management department was found be defective in the aspect of the required process guidance documents;

N13

The shipyard failed to effectively supervise the operators on site to strictly implement the safety management system and the operation instruction;

N14

The safety management department of the shipyard did not strictly implement the safety management regulations - there was no confirmation of the key operation;

N16

The superintendent of the civil marine project failed to effectively supervise the issues in risk prevention;

N17

The managers and officers in the civil marine project failed to pay much attention to the preventive measures in the field of safety when formulating the operation plan;

N18

The superintendent of the civil marine project did not eliminate the potential dangers for the common operation in time;

N20

The nitrogen accumulated in the enclosed space on site;

N22

The person in charge of the operation on site did not implement safety-related regulations, such as confirmation, lighting, and supervision;

N23

The person in charge of the operation on site failed to give input on the operation environment and provide caution to the operators;

N24

The person in charge of the on-site operation did not confirm the ventilation;

N25

The operators on site did not implement the required risk-prevention measures for the operation in the limited space;

N26

The operator on site did not apply for a permit for the operation procedures;

N27

The person in charge of the operation on site failed to check the operation permit in the limited space before the operation;

N28

The person in charge of the operation on site did not confirm the implementation of gas detection;

N29

The person in charge of the operation on site did not effectively perform their designated responsibility during the operation;

N30

The work associated with risk identification before the operation was not performed by the person in charge of the operation;

N32

The removing of the U pipe containing nitrogen in the enclosed space is usually characterized by high risk, which was not did not receive due attention from the operators on site;

N33

The risk-prevention measures applicable for the enclosed space were not in place before the operation, and various potential risks were not effectively identified;

N34

The process guidance documents for the officers in the general assembly department were absent;

N35

The officers in the general assembly department failed to identify all the risks associated with the temporary operation;

N36

The officers in the general assembly department failed to implement the safety-related measures designed for the holiday season;

N37

The person on duty in the general assembly department did not perform their responsibilities effectively;

N38

The officers in the general assembly department failed to implement the safety training for the temporary operators in relation to operative environments and the potential risks;

N39

The officers in the general assembly department did not effectively perform their supervision and risk monitoring responsibilities;

N40

Most of the people involved in the accident were found to have low awareness of the safety-related issues during the May 1st Labor Day;

UA

Unsafe acts;

UP

Precondition for unsafe acts;

US

Unsafe supervision;

OI

Organizational influence;

PersonnelSuffocation

References

Qiao, W., Guo, H., Huang, E., Deng, W., Lian, C., & Chen, H. (2022). Human-Related Hazardous Events Assessment for Suffocation on Ships by Integrating Bayesian Network and Complex Network. Applied Sciences, 12(14), 6905.