nearZeroVar
diagnoses predictors that have one unique value (i.e. are zero variance predictors) or predictors that are have both of the following characteristics: they have very few unique values relative to the number of samples and the ratio of the frequency of the most common value to the frequency of the second most common value is large. checkConditionalX
looks at the distribution of the columns of x
conditioned on the levels of y
and identifies columns of x
that are sparse within groups of y
.nearZeroVar(x, freqCut = 95/5, uniqueCut = 10, saveMetrics = FALSE)
checkConditionalX(x, y)
checkResamples(index, x, y)
x
for a given resamplenearZeroVar
: if saveMetrics = FALSE
, a vector of integers corresponding to the column positions of the problematic predictors. If saveMetrics = TRUE
, a data frame with columns:checkResamples
or checkConditionalX
, a vector of column indicators for predictors with empty conditional distributions in at least one class of y
.To be flagged, first the frequency of the most prevalent value over the
second most frequent value (called the ``frequency ratio'') must be
above freqCut
. Secondly, the ``percent of unique values,'' the
number of unique values divided by the total number of samples (times
100), must also be below uniqueCut
.
In the above example, the frequency ratio is 999 and the unique value percentage is 0.0001.
Checking the conditional distribution of x
may be needed for some models, such as naive Bayes where the conditional distributions should have at least one data point within a class.
nearZeroVar(iris[, -5], saveMetrics = TRUE)
data(BloodBrain)
nearZeroVar(bbbDescr)
set.seed(1)
classes <- factor(rep(letters[1:3], each = 30))
x <- data.frame(x1 = rep(c(0, 1), 45),
x2 = c(rep(0, 10), rep(1, 80)))
lapply(x, table, y = classes)
checkConditionalX(x, classes)
folds <- createFolds(classes, k = 3, returnTrain = TRUE)
x$x3 <- x$x1
x$x3[folds[[1]]] <- 0
checkResamples(folds, x, classes)
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab