kullCOP
) of the two copulas from the true copula density can be measured for a sample of size $n$ and bivariate sample realizations ${u_i, v_i}$ by
$$\hat{D}_{12} = n^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^n D_i\mbox{,}$$
where $\hat{D}_{12}$ is referred to in the Joe (2015, p. 258) reports that these three intervals can be used for diagnostic inference as follows. If an interval contains 0 (zero), then copulas $\mathbf{C}_1(\Theta_1)$ and $\mathbf{C}_2(\Theta_2)$ are not considered significantly different. If the interval does not contain 0, then copula $\mathbf{C}_1(\Theta_1)$ or $\mathbf{C}_2(\Theta_2)$ is the better fit depending on whether the interval is completely below 0 (thus $\mathbf{C}_1(\Theta_1)$ better fit) or above 0 (thus $\mathbf{C}_2(\Theta_2)$ better fit), respectively. Joe (2015) goes on the emphasize that
vuongCOP(u, v=NULL, cop1=NULL, cop2=NULL, para1=NULL, para2=NULL,
alpha=0.05, method=c("D12", "AIC", "BIC"), ...)
NULL
then u
is treated as a two column Rdata.frame
;densityCOP
function.list
is returned having the following components:data.frame
containing the lower and upper bounds of Vuong's $D$ at the respective confidence interval percentage along with $\hat{D}_{12}$ and $\sigma^2_{12}$;data.frame
containing the lower and upper bounds of Vuong's $\mathrm{AIC}$ at the respective confidence interval percentage along with $\mathrm{AIC}$; anddata.frame
containing the lower and upper bounds of Vuong's $\mathrm{BIC}$ at the respective confidence interval percentage along with $\mathrm{BIC}$.Nelsen, R.B., 2006, An introduction to copulas: New York, Springer, 269 p.
Salvadori, G., De Michele, C., Kottegoda, N.T., and Rosso, R., 2007, Extremes in Nature---An approach using copulas: Springer, 289 p.
densityCOP
, kullCOP
, simCOP
# See extended code listings and discussion in the Note section
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab