Last chance! 50% off unlimited learning
Sale ends in
P
) and the $\mathbf{M}$ copula (M
). The parameterization here has assocation increasing with increasing $\Theta$, which differs from Nelsen (2006) and also the copula is formed with right-tail increasing reflection of Nelsen's presentation because it is anticipated that PARETOcop(u, v, para=NULL, ...)
M
, P
z <- seq(0.01,0.99, by=0.01) # Both copulas have Kendall Tau = 1/3
plot( z, kfuncCOP(z, cop=PARETOcop, para=1), lwd=2,
xlab="z <= Z", ylab="F_K(z)", type="l")
lines(z, kfuncCOP(z, cop=GHcop, para=1.5), lwd=2, col=2) # red line
# All extreme value copulas have the same Kendall Function [F_K(z)], the
# Gumbel-Hougaard is such a copula and the F_K(z) for the Pareto does not
# plot on top and thus is not an extreme value but shares a "closeness."
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab