supreme.sup

A dataset from: Durr, Robert H., Andrew D. Martin, and Christina Wolbrecht. 2000. "Ideological divergence and public support for the Supreme Court." American Journal of Policial Science 44(4): 768-776.

datasets

While autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) models allow for extremely flexible dynamics, interpreting substantive significance of complex lag structures remains difficult. This package is designed to assist users in dynamically simulating and plotting the results of various ARDL models. It also contains post-estimation diagnostics, including a test for cointegration when estimating the error-correction variant of the autoregressive distributed lag model (Pesaran, Shin, and Smith 2001 <doi:10.1002/jae.616>).

Soren Jordan

dynamac

Dynamic Simulation and Testing for Single-Equation ARDL Models

Andrew Q. Philips

supreme.sup function

A data frame with 42 rows and 9 variables:<dl>
 <dt>dcalc</dt>
<dd>Supreme Court support</dd> <dt>l_dcalc</dt>
<dd>Lagged Supreme Court spport</dd> <dt>iddiv</dt>
<dd>Ideological divergence</dd> <dt>mooddev</dt>
<dd>Mean deviation of Mood</dd> <dt>dirdev</dt>
<dd>Mean deviation of percent liberal decisions</dd> <dt>sg</dt>
<dd>Rulings against Solicitor General's amicus briefs</dd> <dt>laws</dt>
<dd>Laws declared unconstitutional</dd> <dt>presapp</dt>
<dd>Approval of president</dd> <dt>congapp</dt>
<dd>Approval of Congress</dd>
</dl>

Format

Data on US Supreme Court Approval — supreme.sup

A data frame with 42 rows and 9 variables:<dl>
 <dt>dcalc</dt>
<dd>Supreme Court support</dd>

 <dt>l_dcalc</dt>
<dd>Lagged Supreme Court spport</dd>

 <dt>iddiv</dt>
<dd>Ideological divergence</dd>

 <dt>mooddev</dt>
<dd>Mean deviation of Mood</dd>

 <dt>dirdev</dt>
<dd>Mean deviation of percent liberal decisions</dd>

 <dt>sg</dt>
<dd>Rulings against Solicitor General's amicus briefs</dd>

 <dt>laws</dt>
<dd>Laws declared unconstitutional</dd>

 <dt>presapp</dt>
<dd>Approval of president</dd>

 <dt>congapp</dt>
<dd>Approval of Congress</dd>


</dl>

supreme.sup: Data on US Supreme Court Approval

Description

Usage

Arguments

Format