peer_form_create_rating
creates a short feedback form for authors to rate the feedback they got from reviewers. The rating categories are based on Reily, K. and P. Ludford Finnerty, and L. Terveen (2009): Two Peers Are Better Than One: Aggregating Peer Reviews for Computing Assignments is Surprisingly Accurate. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work. GROUP<U+2019>09, May 10<U+2013>13, 2009, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA.
peer_form_create_rating(
category = c("helpfulness", "accuracy", "fairness"),
title = "Author rating form",
fname = "feedback_blank_rating",
output = "github_document",
write_rmd = TRUE,
overwrite = FALSE,
allow_comment = FALSE
)
Character. Categories to be included in the feedback form, defaults to c("helpfulness", "accuracy", "fairness")
.
Character. Title of form, defaults to "Author rating form".
Character. File name of RMarkdown document to be written to memory, defaults to feedback_blank_rating
.
Character. Output parameter for .Rmd
file, defaults to github_document
.
Logical. Whether the feedback form should be saved to a .Rmd
file in the current working directory, defaults to TRUE.
Logical. Should existing file or files with same name be overwritten, defaults to FALSE
.
Logical. Should optional comment field be included? Defaults to FALSE
.
Other peer review functions:
peer_assign()
,
peer_file_add_aut()
,
peer_file_add_rev()
,
peer_form_create_review()
,
peer_init()
,
peer_return()
,
peer_roster_create()
,
peer_score_rating()
,
peer_score_review()
# NOT RUN {
peer_form_create_rating(c("accuracy", "fairness"))
# }
# NOT RUN {
# }
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab