Using %>%
with unary function calls
When functions require only one argument, x %>% f
is equivalent
to f(x)
(not exactly equivalent; see technical note below.)
Placing lhs
as the first argument in rhs
call
The default behavior of %>%
when multiple arguments are required
in the rhs
call, is to place lhs
as the first argument, i.e.
x %>% f(y)
is equivalent to f(x, y)
.
Placing lhs
elsewhere in rhs
call
Often you will want lhs
to the rhs
call at another position than the first.
For this purpose you can use the dot (.
) as placeholder. For example,
y %>% f(x, .)
is equivalent to f(x, y)
and
z %>% f(x, y, arg = .)
is equivalent to f(x, y, arg = z)
.
Using the dot for secondary purposes
Often, some attribute or property of lhs
is desired in the rhs
call in
addition to the value of lhs
itself, e.g. the number of rows or columns.
It is perfectly valid to use the dot placeholder several times in the rhs
call, but by design the behavior is slightly different when using it inside
nested function calls. In particular, if the placeholder is only used
in a nested function call, lhs
will also be placed as the first argument!
The reason for this is that in most use-cases this produces the most readable
code. For example, iris %>% subset(1:nrow(.) %% 2 == 0)
is
equivalent to iris %>% subset(., 1:nrow(.) %% 2 == 0)
but
slightly more compact. It is possible to overrule this behavior by enclosing
the rhs
in braces. For example, 1:10 %>% {c(min(.), max(.))}
is
equivalent to c(min(1:10), max(1:10))
.
Using %>% with call- or function-producing rhs
It is possible to force evaluation of rhs
before the piping of lhs
takes
place. This is useful when rhs
produces the relevant call or function.
To evaluate rhs
first, enclose it in parentheses, i.e.
a %>% (function(x) x^2)
, and 1:10 %>% (call("sum"))
.
Another example where this is relevant is for reference class methods
which are accessed using the $
operator, where one would do
x %>% (rc$f)
, and not x %>% rc$f
.
Using lambda expressions with %>%
Each rhs
is essentially a one-expression body of a unary function.
Therefore defining lambdas in magrittr is very natural, and as
the definitions of regular functions: if more than a single expression
is needed one encloses the body in a pair of braces, { rhs }
.
However, note that within braces there are no "first-argument rule":
it will be exactly like writing a unary function where the argument name is
".
" (the dot).
Using the dot-place holder as lhs
When the dot is used as lhs
, the result will be a functional sequence,
i.e. a function which applies the entire chain of right-hand sides in turn
to its input. See the examples.