Understanding the Output
An AME of 0.03 for age means: averaged over the sample, one
additional year of age increases the predicted probability of the
outcome by 3 percentage points. Unlike odds ratios, AMEs are directly
comparable across models and across groups, which is why they are the
preferred reporting style in much of the social sciences.
When to Use This
Technical Details
Continuous predictors use a centered numerical derivative of the
predicted probability; factor predictors use the average discrete
change against the reference level. Standard errors come from the
delta method with the analytic gradient of the AME with respect to
the coefficients and the model's Wald covariance matrix, matching the
default in Stata's margins and R's margins package.
Weighted models average with their frequency weights (unrounded,
Charter §5.1); at weights == 1 the weighted AME reduces
exactly to the unweighted one.
Linear regression: AMEs are not needed there — for a linear
model without interactions or transformations, the unstandardized
coefficient B is the marginal effect, already shown in the
linear_regression coefficients table. Calling
marginal_effects() on a linear_regression result says
so instead of duplicating the table.
Validation: SPSS has no AME procedure, so this function is
Tier 4 (Internal) under the Validation Charter — verified against the
analytic logit-AME formula and an independent finite-difference
delta-method recomputation, not against SPSS output.