meta(y, v, x, data, intercept.constraints = NULL, coef.constraints = NULL, RE.constraints = NULL, RE.startvalues=0.1, RE.lbound = 1e-10, intervals.type = c("z", "LB"), I2="I2q", R2=TRUE, model.name="Meta analysis with ML", suppressWarnings = TRUE, silent = TRUE, run = TRUE, ...)vech.
t(as.matrix(intercept.constraints)). The default is that the intercepts are free. When there is no predictor, these intercepts are the same as
the pooled effect sizes. The format of this matrix follows
as.mxMatrix. The intercepts can be
constrained equally by using the same labels.
as.matrix(). The default is that all $m$ predictors predict all $p$ effect sizes. The
format of this matrix follows
as.mxMatrix. The regression coefficients can be
constrained equally by using the same labels.
as.matrix(). The default is that all
covariance/variance components are free. The format of this matrix
follows as.mxMatrix. Elements of the variance
components can be constrained equally by using the same labels. If a zero matrix is
specified, it becomes a fixed-effects meta-analysis.
NA. A $p$ x
$p$ symmetric matrix of the lower bounds is also accepted.
z (default if missing) or
LB. If it is z, it calculates the 95% Wald confidence
intervals (CIs) based on the z statistic. If it is LB, it
calculates the 95% likelihood-based CIs on the
parameter estimates. Note that the z values and their
associated p values are based on the z statistic. They are not
related to the likelihood-based CIs.
"I2q", "I2hm" and
"I2am". They represent the I2 calculated by using a
typical within-study sampling variance from the Q statistic, the
harmonic mean and the arithmatic mean of the within-study sampling
variances (Xiong, Miller, & Morris, 2010). More than one options are possible. If intervals.type="LB", 95% confidence intervals on the heterogeneity indices will be constructed.
TRUE and there are predictors, R2 is
calculated (Raudenbush, 2009).
mxModel.
TRUE, warnings are
suppressed. Argument to be passed to mxRun.mxRunFALSE, only return the mx model without
running the analysis.mxRunmeta with a list of
match.callTRUEmxRunmxRunCheung, M. W.-L. (2009). Constructing approximate confidence intervals for parameters with structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 267-294.
Cheung, M. W.-L. (2013). Multivariate meta-analysis as structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 429-454. Hardy, R. J., & Thompson, S. G. (1996). A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects. Statistics in Medicine, 15, 619-629. Neale, M. C., & Miller, M. B. (1997). The use of likelihood-based confidence intervals in genetic models. Behavior Genetics, 27, 113-120.
Raudenbush, S. W. (2009). Analyzing effect sizes: random effects models. In H. M. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 295-315). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Xiong, C., Miller, J. P., & Morris, J. C. (2010). Measuring study-specific heterogeneity in meta-analysis: application to an antecedent biomarker study of alzheimer's disease. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 2(3), 300-309. doi:10.1198/sbr.2009.0067
reml, Hox02,
Berkey98, wvs94a