gymnasts:
Performance of 40 gymnasts rated by eigth judges according to two different rulebook
Description
A data frame containing the score performance of 40 gymnasts, 20 evaluated by eight judges using the old rulebook and 20 by the same judges using the new rulebook
Usage
data(gymnasts)
Arguments
Format
A data frame with 40 observations on the following 9 variables:
Rulebook
a factor with levels New and Old according to which rulebook was used.
Jude.1
a numeric vector with the ratings of the first judge.
Jude.2
a numeric vector with the ratings of the second judge.
Jude.3
a numeric vector with the ratings of the third judge.
Jude.4
a numeric vector with the ratings of the fourth judge.
Jude.5
a numeric vector with the ratings of the fifth judge.
Jude.6
a numeric vector with the ratings of the sixth judge.
Jude.7
a numeric vector with the ratings of the seventh judge.
Jude.8
a numeric vector with the ratings of the eighth judge.
Source
artificial data
Details
Assume that a new rulebook has been recently proposed and subsequently criticized. Consider a random sample of eight judges evaluating a random sample of 20 gymnasts with the old rulebook, and a different random sample of 20 gymnasts with the new rulebook.
References
Henriques, T., Antunes, L., Bernardes, J., Matias, M., Sato, D. and Costa-Santos, C. (2013) Information-based measure of disagreement for more than two observers: a useful tool to compare the degree of observer disagreement. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 13(1):47.