Dyads are capable of having multiple disputes in a given year, which can create a problem
for merging into a complete dyad-year data frame. Consider the case of France and Italy in 1860, which
had three separate dispute onsets that year (MID#0112, MID#0113, MID#0306), as illustrative of the problem.
This merging process employs the following rules to whittle down these duplicate dispute-year observations. It
first selects on MID onsets, then selecting highest fatality level, then highest hostility level, then
the longest estimating minimum dispute duration, and finally, in the event of duplicates still outstanding,
selecting the MID that came first. This is how GML present their full directed and non-directed dyad-year data.