Choosing the right distributional family for regression models is essential to get more accurate estimates and standard errors. This function may help to check a models' distributional family and see if the model-family probably should be reconsidered. Since it is difficult to exactly predict the correct model family, consider this function as somewhat experimental.
check_distribution(model)
Typically, a model (that should response to residuals()
).
May also be a numeric vector.
This function uses an internal random forest model to classify the
distribution from a model-family. Currently, following distributions are
trained (i.e. results of check_distribution()
may be one of the
following): "bernoulli"
, "beta"
, "beta-binomial"
, "binomial"
,
"cauchy"
, "chi"
, "exponential"
, "F"
, "gamma"
, "half-cauchy"
,
"inverse-gamma"
, "lognormal"
, "normal"
, "negative binomial"
,
"negative binomial (zero-inflated)"
, "pareto"
, "poisson"
,
"poisson (zero-inflated)"
, "tweedie"
, "uniform"
and "weibull"
.
Note the similarity between certain distributions according to shape, skewness,
etc. Thus, the predicted distribution may not be perfectly representing the
distributional family of the underlying fitted model, or the response value.
There is a plot()
method, which shows the probabilities of all predicted
distributions, however, only if the probability is greater than zero.
if (FALSE) { # require("lme4") && require("parameters") && require("randomForest")
data(sleepstudy, package = "lme4")
model <<- lme4::lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (Days | Subject), sleepstudy)
check_distribution(model)
}
if (FALSE) { # require("see") && require("patchwork") && require("randomForest")
plot(check_distribution(model))
}
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab