Urgency in political discourses is an expression of how necessary and/or
how soon an action should be undertaken or completed.
This is measured along four dimensions,
two related to necessity and two related to timing.
The first two dimensions, degree of intensity and degree of commitment,
relate to the necessity of taking the action, while the next two dimensions,
frequency of action and timing of action,
relate to the timing in which action is taken.
Our dictionary includes terms in each of these dimensions.
The terms included in each of these dimensions were validated and adjusted
through an online survey that took place between July and August of 2024.
The survey results were recorded as counts of the number of participants
who selected an urgency-related word as more urgent than its pair.
To analyze the survey results, we employed Bradley-Terry models for
paired comparisons.
A rank of the words for each dimension of urgency was obtained from the analysis,
which were then used to create the urgency word scores in the dictionaries.
For more information on the dimensions, scores, or the survey on urgency,
please run `get_urgency()` to access the urgency codebook.
For priorities (i.e. coded using the `select_priorities()`),
urgency scores are calculated by multiplying the commitment scores by all
other dimensions.
This is done because commitment words are indicative of political priorities,
For more information please refer to the `select_priorities()` function.
For vectors or data frames urgency scores are calculated by
adding commitment and intensity dimension scores (i.e. how necessary)
and multiplying these by the sum of timing and frequency dimension
scores (i.e. how soon).
In both cases, zero urgency scores are indicative of no urgency but maximum
scores can vary.