`psm_analysis()`

performs an analysis of consumer price
preferences and price sensitivity known as **van
Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM)**. It takes respondent's
price preferences (from survey data) as an input and estimates
acceptable price ranges and price points. For a description of
the method see the *Details* section.

```
psm_analysis(
toocheap, cheap, expensive, tooexpensive,
data = NA,
validate = TRUE,
interpolate = FALSE,
intersection_method = "min",
pi_cheap = NA, pi_expensive = NA,
pi_scale = 5:1,
pi_calibrated = c(0.7, 0.5, 0.3, 0.1, 0))
```

toocheap, cheap, expensive, tooexpensive

If a
data.frame/matrix is provided in the `data`

argument:
names of the variables in the data.frame/matrix that contain
the survey data on the respondents' "too cheap", "cheap",
"expensive" and "too expensive" price preferences.

If no data.frame/matrix is provided in the `data`

argument: numeric vectors that directly include this
information. If numeric vectors are provided, it is assumed
that they are sorted by respondent ID (the preferences for
respondent `n`

are stored at the `n`

-th position in
all vectors).

If the `toocheap`

price was not assessed, a
variable/vector of NAs can be used instead. This
variable/vector needs to have the same length as the other
survey information. If `toocheap`

is NA for all cases,
it is possible to calculate the Point of Marginal
Expensiveness and the Indifference Price Point, but it is
impossible to calculate the Point of Marginal Cheapness and
the Optimal Price Point.

data

data.frame or matrix that contains the function's
input data. `data`

input is not mandatory: Instead of
using one data.frame/matrix as an input, it is also possible
to provide the data directly as vectors in the "too cheap",
"cheap", "expensive" and "too expensive" arguments.

validate

logical. should only respondents with consistent price preferences (too cheap < cheap < expensive < too expensive) be considered in the analysis?

interpolate

logical. should interpolation of the price curves be applied between the actual prices given by the respondents? If interpolation is enabled, the output appears less bumpy in regions with sparse price information. If the sample size is sufficiently large, interpolation should not be necessary.

intersection_method

"min" (default), "max", "mean" or "median". defines the method how to determine the price points (range, indifference price, optimal price) if there are multiple possible intersections of the price curves. "min" uses the lowest possible prices, "max" uses the highest possible prices, "mean" calculates the mean among all intersections and "median" uses the median of all possible intersections

pi_cheap, pi_expensive

Only required for the Newton
Miller Smith extension. If `data`

argument is provided:
names of the variables in the data.frame/matrix that contain
the survey data on the respondents' purchase intent at their
individual cheap/expensive price.

pi_scale

Only required for the Newton Miller Smith extension. Scale of the purchase intent variables pi_cheap and pi_expensive. By default assuming a five-point scale with 5 indicating the highest purchase intent.

pi_calibrated

Only required for the Newton Miller Smith extension. Calibrated purchase probabilities that are assumed for each value of the purchase intent scale. Must be the same order as the pi_scale variable so that the first value of pi_calibrated corresponds to the first value in the pi_scale variable. Default values are taken from the Sawtooth Software PSM implementation in Excel: 70% for the best value of the purchase intent scale, 50% for the second best value, 30% for the third best value (middle of the scale), 10% for the fourth best value and 0% for the worst value.

The function output consists of the following elements:

`data_input`

:`data.frame`

object. Contains
the data that was used as an input for the analysis.

`validated`

:`logical`

object. Indicates
whether the `"validate"`

option has been used (to
exclude cases with intransitive price preferences).

`invalid_cases`

:`numeric`

object. Number
of cases with intransitive price preferences.

`total_sample`

:`"numeric"`

object.
Total sample size of the input sample *before*
assessing the transitivity of individual price preferences.

`data_vanwestendorp`

:`data.frame`

object.
Output data of the Price Sensitivity Meter analysis.
Contains the cumulative distribution functions for the four
price assessments (too cheap, cheap, expensive, too
expensive) for all prices.

`pricerange_lower`

:`numeric`

object. Lower
limit of the acceptable price range as defined by the
Price Sensitivity Meter, also known as **point of
marginal cheapness**: Intersection of the "too cheap" and the
"not cheap" curves.

`pricerange_upper`

:`numeric`

object. Upper
limit of the acceptable price range as defined by the Price
Sensitivity Meter, also known as **point of marginal
expensiveness**: Intersection of the "too expensive" and the
"not expensive" curves.

`idp`

:`numeric`

object. **Indifference
Price Point** as defined by the Price Sensitivity Meter:
Intersection of the "cheap" and the "expensive" curves.

`opp`

:`numeric`

object. **Optimal
Price Point** as defined by the Price Sensitivity Meter:
Intersection of the "too cheap" and the "too expensive"
curves.

`NMS`

:`logical`

object. Indicates whether
the additional analyses of the Newton Miller Smith Extension
were performed.

`weighted`

:`logical`

object. Indicates
if weighted data was used in the analysis. Outputs from
`psm_analysis()`

always have the value `FALSE`

.
When data is weighted, use the function
`psm_analysis_weighted.`

`data_nms`

:`data.frame`

object. Output of
the Newton Miller Smith extension: calibrated mean
purchase probabilities for each price point.

`pi_scale`

:`data.frame`

object. Shows the
values of the purchase intent variable and the
corresponding calibrated purchase probabilities as defined
in the function input for the Newton Miller Smith
extension.

`price_optimal_trial`

:`numeric`

object.
Output of the Newton Miller Smith extension: Estimate for
the price with the highest trial rate.

`price_optimal_revenue`

:`numeric`

object.
Output of the Newton Miller Smith extension:
Estimate for the price with the highest revenue (based on
the trial rate).

The Price Sensitivity Meter method for the analysis of consumer price preferences was proposed by the Dutch economist Peter van Westendorp in 1976 at the ESOMAR conference. It is a survey-based approach that has become one of the standard price acceptance measurement techniques in the market research industry and is still widely used for during early-stage product development.

Price acceptance and price sensitivity are measured in van Westendorp's approach by four open-ended survey questions:

At which price on this scale are you beginning to experience … (test-product) as cheap?

At which price on this scale are you beginning to experience … (test-product) as expensive?

At which price on this scale you are beginning to experience … (test-product) as too expensive -- so that you would never consider buying it yourself?

At which price on this scale you are beginning to experience … (test-product) as too cheap -- so that you say "at this price the quality cannot be good"?

Respondents with inconsistent price preferences (e.g. "cheap" price larger than "expensive" price) are usually removed from the data set. This function has built-in checks to detect invalid preference structures and removes those respondents from the analysis by default.

To analyze price preferences and price sensitivity, the method
uses cumulative distribution functions for each of the
aforementioned price steps (e.g. "how many respondents think
that a price of `x`

*or more* is expensive?"). By
convention, the distributions for the "too cheap" and the
"cheap" price are inverted. This leads to the interpretation
"how many respondents think that a price of *up to*
`x`

is (too) cheap?".

The interpretation is built on the analysis of the intersections of the four cumulative distribution functions for the different prices (usually via graphical inspection). The original paper describes the four intersections as follows:

**Point of Marginal Cheapness (MGP)**: Below this price point, there are more respondents that consider the price as "too cheap" than respondents who consider it as "not cheap" (intersection of "too cheap" and "not cheap"). This is interpreted as the lower limit of the range of acceptable prices.**Point of Marginal Expensiveness (MEP)**. Above this price point, there are more respondent that consider the price as "too expensive" than there are respondents who consider it as "not expensive" (intersection of "not expensive" and "too expensive"). This is interpreted as the upper limit of the range of acceptable prices.**Indifference Price Point (IDP)**: The same number of respondents perceives the price as "cheap" and "expensive" (intersection of "cheap" and "expensive"). In van Westendorp's interpretation, this is either the median price paid in the market or the price of an important market-leader.**Optimal Price Point (OPP)**: The same number of respondents perceives the product as "too cheap" and "too expensive" (intersection of "too cheap" and "too expensive"). van Westendorp argues that this is the value for which the respondents' resistance against the price is particularly low.

Besides those four intersections, van Westendorp's article advises to analyze the cumulative distribution functions for steep areas which indicate price steps.

To analyze trial rates and estimate revenue forecasts,
Newton/Miller/Smith have extended van Westendorp's original
model by adding two purchase intent questions that are asked for
the respondent's "cheap" and "expensive" price. The purchase
probability at the respondent's "too cheap" and "too expensive"
price are defined as `0`

. The main logic is that the "too
expensive" price point is prohibitively expensive for the
respondent and a price at the "too cheap" price level raises
doubts about the product quality.

By combining the standard van Westendorp questions with those two additional purchase intent questions, it becomes possible to summarize the purchase probabilities across respondents (using linear interpolation for the purchase probabilities between each respondent's cornerstone prices). The maximum of this curve is then defined as the price point with the highest expected trial rate. Moreover, by multiplying the trial rate with the price, it also becomes possible to estimate a price with the highest expected revenue.

It has to be noted that the van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter is useful in some cases, but does not answer every pricing-related question. It may be a good tool to assess very broadly if the consumers' price perceptions exceed the actual production costs. For more complex analyses (e.g. defining specific prices for different products to avoid cannibalization and drive at the same time incremental growth), other methodological approaches are needed.

Van Westendorp, P (1976) "NSS-Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM) --
A new approach to study consumer perception of price"
*Proceedings of the ESOMAR 29th Congress*, 139--167. Online
available at https://rwconnect.esomar.org/a-new-approach-to-study-consumer-perception-of-price/.

Newton, D, Miller, J, Smith, P, (1993) "A market acceptance
extension to traditional price sensitivity measurement"
*Proceedings of the American Marketing Association
Advanced Research Techniques Forum*.

Sawtooth Software (2016) "Templates for van Westendorp PSM for Lighthouse Studio and Excel". Online available at https://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/204-about-us/news-and-events/sawtooth-solutions/1759-templates-for-van-westendorp-psm-for-lighthouse-studio-excel

The function `psm_analysis_weighted()`

performs the same
analyses for weighted data.

```
# NOT RUN {
set.seed(42)
# standard van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter Analysis
# input directly via vectors
tch <- round(rnorm(n = 250, mean = 5, sd = 0.5), digits = 2)
ch <- round(rnorm(n = 250, mean = 8.5, sd = 0.5), digits = 2)
ex <- round(rnorm(n = 250, mean = 13, sd = 0.75), digits = 2)
tex <- round(rnorm(n = 250, mean = 17, sd = 1), digits = 2)
output_psm_demo1 <- psm_analysis(toocheap = tch,
cheap = ch,
expensive = ex,
tooexpensive = tex)
# additional analysis with Newton Miller Smith Extension
# input via data.frame
pint_ch <- sample(x = c(1:5), size = length(tex),
replace = TRUE, prob = c(0.1, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.3))
pint_ex <- sample(x = c(1:5), size = length(tex),
replace = TRUE, prob = c(0.3, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, 0.1))
data_psm_demo <- data.frame(tch, ch, ex, tex, pint_ch, pint_ex)
output_psm_demo2 <- psm_analysis(toocheap = "tch",
cheap = "ch",
expensive = "ex",
tooexpensive = "tex",
pi_cheap = "pint_ch",
pi_expensive = "pint_ex",
data = data_psm_demo)
summary(output_psm_demo2)
# }
```

Run the code above in your browser using DataCamp Workspace