concordance: Inter rater agreement among a set of raters
Description
Computes a statistic as an index of inter rater agreement among a set of raters. This procedure is based on a statistic not affected by Kappa paradoxes.
It is also possible to evaluate if the agreement is nil using the test argument.
The p value can be approximated using the Normal, Chi squared distribution or
using Monte Carlo algorithm.
Normal approximation and Monte Carlo procedure can be calculated
even though the number of observers is not the same for each evaluated subject.
Fleiss Kappa is also shown and its confidence interval is
available when the number of observes is the same for each classified subject.
Usage
concordance(db, test = "Default", B = 1000, alpha = 0.05)
Arguments
db
n*c matrix or data frame, n subjects c categories. The numbers inside the matrix or data frame indicate how many raters chose a specific category for a given subject. A sum of row indicates the total number of raters who evaluated a given subject.
test
Statistical test to evaluate if the raters make random assignment regardless of the characteristic of each subject. Under null hypothesis, it corresponds to a high percentage of assignment errors. Thus, the expected agreement is weak.
Normal approximat
B
Number of iterations for Monte Carlo test.
alpha
Level of significance.
Value
A list containing the following components:
$FleissFleiss Kappa index.
$SComputed index of inter rater agreement not affected by Kappa paradoxes.
$LowerLower limit of Fleiss Kappa confidence interval. It is computed only when the number of raters is the same for all subjects.
$UpperUpper limit of Fleiss Kappa confidence interval. It is computed only when the number of raters is the same for all subjects.
$pvalueP value for the statistical test.
References
Fleiss, J.L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76, 378-382
Falotico, R. Quatto, P. (2010). On avoiding paradoxes in assessing inter-rater agreement. Italian Journal of Applied Statistics 22, 151-160