rpact (version 4.2.0)

getGroupSequentialProbabilities: Get Group Sequential Probabilities

Description

Calculates probabilities in the group sequential setting.

Usage

getGroupSequentialProbabilities(decisionMatrix, informationRates)

Value

Returns a numeric matrix containing the probabilities described in the details section.

Arguments

decisionMatrix

A matrix with either 2 or 4 rows and kMax = length(informationRates) columns, see details.

informationRates

The information rates t_1, ..., t_kMax (that must be fixed prior to the trial), default is (1:kMax) / kMax. For the weighted inverse normal design, the weights are derived through w_1 = sqrt(t_1), and w_k = sqrt(t_k - t_(k-1)). For the weighted Fisher's combination test, the weights (scales) are w_k = sqrt((t_k - t_(k-1)) / t_1) (see the documentation).

Details

Given a sequence of information rates (fixing the correlation structure), and decisionMatrix with either 2 or 4 rows and kMax = length(informationRates) columns, this function calculates a probability matrix containing, for two rows, the probabilities:
P(Z_1 < l_1), P(l_1 < Z_1 < u_1, Z_2 < l_2),..., P(l_kMax-1 < Z_kMax-1 < u_kMax-1, Z_kMax < l_l_kMax)
P(Z_1 < u_1), P(l_1 < Z_1 < u_1, Z_2 < u_2),..., P(l_kMax-1 < Z_kMax-1 < u_kMax-1, Z_kMax < u_l_kMax)
P(Z_1 < Inf), P(l_1 < Z_1 < u_1, Z_2 < Inf),..., P(l_kMax-1 < Z_kMax-1 < u_kMax-1, Z_kMax < Inf)
with continuation matrix
l_1,...,l_kMax
u_1,...,u_kMax
That is, the output matrix of the function provides per stage (column) the cumulative probabilities for values specified in decisionMatrix and Inf, and reaching the stage, i.e., the test statistics is in the continuation region for the preceding stages. For 4 rows, the continuation region contains of two regions and the probability matrix is obtained analogously (cf., Wassmer and Brannath, 2016).

See Also

Other design functions: getDesignCharacteristics(), getDesignConditionalDunnett(), getDesignFisher(), getDesignGroupSequential(), getDesignInverseNormal(), getPowerAndAverageSampleNumber()

Examples

if (FALSE) {
# Calculate Type I error rates in the two-sided group sequential setting when
# performing kMax stages with constant critical boundaries at level alpha:
alpha <- 0.05
kMax <- 10
decisionMatrix <- matrix(c(
    rep(-qnorm(1 - alpha / 2), kMax),
    rep(qnorm(1 - alpha / 2), kMax)
), nrow = 2, byrow = TRUE)
informationRates <- (1:kMax) / kMax
probs <- getGroupSequentialProbabilities(decisionMatrix, informationRates)
cumsum(probs[3, ] - probs[2, ] + probs[1, ])

# Do the same for a one-sided design without futility boundaries:
decisionMatrix <- matrix(c(
    rep(-Inf, kMax),
    rep(qnorm(1 - alpha), kMax)
), nrow = 2, byrow = TRUE)
informationRates <- (1:kMax) / kMax
probs <- getGroupSequentialProbabilities(decisionMatrix, informationRates)
cumsum(probs[3, ] - probs[2, ])

# Check that two-sided Pampallona and Tsiatis boundaries with binding 
# futility bounds obtain Type I error probabilities equal to alpha:
x <- getDesignGroupSequential(
    alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.1, kMax = 3, typeOfDesign = "PT",
    deltaPT0 = 0, deltaPT1 = 0.4, sided = 2, bindingFutility = TRUE
)
dm <- matrix(c(
    -x$criticalValues, -x$futilityBounds, 0,
    x$futilityBounds, 0, x$criticalValues
), nrow = 4, byrow = TRUE)
dm[is.na(dm)] <- 0
probs <- getGroupSequentialProbabilities(
    decisionMatrix = dm, informationRates = (1:3) / 3
)
sum(probs[5, ] - probs[4, ] + probs[1, ])

# Check the Type I error rate decrease when using non-binding futility bounds:
x <- getDesignGroupSequential(
    alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.1, kMax = 3, typeOfDesign = "PT",
    deltaPT0 = 0, deltaPT1 = 0.4, sided = 2, bindingFutility = FALSE
)
dm <- matrix(c(
    -x$criticalValues, -x$futilityBounds, 0,
    x$futilityBounds, 0, x$criticalValues
), nrow = 4, byrow = TRUE)
dm[is.na(dm)] <- 0
probs <- getGroupSequentialProbabilities(
    decisionMatrix = dm, informationRates = (1:3) / 3
)
sum(probs[5, ] - probs[4, ] + probs[1, ])
}