The coefficient of variation of effective sampling area predicts the bias in estimated density (Efford and Mowat 2014). These functions assist its calculation from fitted finite mixture models.
CV(x, p, na.rm = FALSE)
CVa0(object, ...)
CVa(object, sessnum = 1, ...)vector of numeric values
vector of class probabilities
logical; if TRUE missing values are dropped from x
fitted secr finite mixture model
integer sequence number of session to analyse
other arguments passed to predict.secr (e.g.,
    newdata)
Numeric
CV computes the coefficient of variation of x. If
    p is provided then the distribution is assumed to be
    discrete, with support x and class membership probabilities
    p (scaled automatically to sum to 1.0).
CVa computes CV(\(a\)) where \(a\) is the effective
    sampling area of Borchers and Efford (2008).
CVa0 computes CV(a0) where a0 is the single-detector sampling
    area defined as \(a_0 = 2 \pi \lambda_0 \sigma^2\) (Efford and Mowat 2014); a0 is a convenient
    surrogate for a, the effective sampling area. CV(a0) uses
    either the fitted MLE of a0 (if the a0 parameterization has been
    used), or a0 computed from the estimates of lambda0 and sigma.
CVa and CVa0 do not work for models with individual
    covariates.
Borchers, D. L. and Efford, M. G. (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture--recapture studies. Biometrics 64, 377--385.
Efford, M. G. and Mowat, G. (2014) Compensatory heterogeneity in capture--recapture data. Ecology 95, 1341--1348.
# NOT RUN {
## housemouse model
CVa0(morning.h2 )
# }
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab