Mathematical Formulation:
1. Index coefficients: \(\mathbf{b} = \mathbf{G}^{-1}\mathbf{d}\)
2. Expected response: \(\Delta \mathbf{G} = (i/\sigma_I) \mathbf{G}\mathbf{b}\)
CRITICAL: Scale Invariance Property
The achieved gains \(\Delta\mathbf{G}\) are determined by selection intensity (i),
genetic variance (G), and phenotypic variance (P), NOT by scaling \(\mathbf{b}\).
If you multiply \(\mathbf{b}\) by constant c, \(\sigma_I\) also scales by c, causing
complete cancellation in \(\Delta\mathbf{G} = (i/(c\sigma_I))\mathbf{G}(c\mathbf{b}) = (i/\sigma_I)\mathbf{G}\mathbf{b}\).
What DG-LPSI Actually Achieves:
- Proportional gains matching the RATIOS in d (not absolute magnitudes)
- Achieved magnitude depends on biological/genetic constraints
- Use feasibility checking to verify if desired gains are realistic
3. Implied economic weights (Section 1.4 of Chapter 4):
$$\hat{\mathbf{w}} = \mathbf{G}^{-1} \mathbf{P} \mathbf{b}$$
The implied weights represent the economic values that would have been needed
in a Smith-Hazel index to achieve the desired gain PROPORTIONS. Large implied weights
indicate traits that are "expensive" to improve (low heritability or unfavorable
correlations), while small weights indicate traits that are "cheap" to improve.
Feasibility Checking:
The function estimates maximum possible gains as approximately 3.0 * sqrt(G_ii)
(assuming very intense selection with i ~ 3.0) and warns if desired gains
exceed 80% of these theoretical maxima.