sjstats (version 0.17.9)

scale_weights: Rescale design weights for multilevel analysis

Description

Most functions to fit multilevel and mixed effects models only allow to specify frequency weights, but not design (i.e. sampling or probability) weights, which should be used when analyzing complex samples and survey data. scale_weights() implements an algorithm proposed by Aaparouhov (2006) and Carle (2009) to rescale design weights in survey data to account for the grouping structure of multilevel models, which then can be used for multilevel modelling.

Usage

scale_weights(x, cluster.id, pweight)

Arguments

x

A data frame.

cluster.id

Variable indicating the grouping structure (strata) of the survey data (level-2-cluster variable).

pweight

Variable indicating the probability (design or sampling) weights of the survey data (level-1-weight).

Value

x, with two new variables: svywght_a and svywght_b, which represent the rescaled design weights to use in multilevel models (use these variables for the weights argument).

Details

Rescaling is based on two methods: For svywght_a, the sample weights pweight are adjusted by a factor that represents the proportion of cluster size divided by the sum of sampling weights within each cluster. The adjustment factor for svywght_b is the sum of sample weights within each cluster devided by the sum of squared sample weights within each cluster (see Carle (2009), Appendix B).

Regarding the choice between scaling methods A and B, Carle suggests that "analysts who wish to discuss point estimates should report results based on weighting method A. For analysts more interested in residual between-cluster variance, method B may generally provide the least biased estimates". In general, it is recommended to fit a non-weighted model and weighted models with both scaling methods and when comparing the models, see whether the "inferential decisions converge", to gain confidence in the results.

Though the bias of scaled weights decreases with increasing cluster size, method A is preferred when insufficient or low cluster size is a concern.

The cluster ID and probably PSU may be used as random effects (e.g. nested design, or cluster and PSU as varying intercepts), depending on the survey design that should be mimicked.

References

Carle AC. Fitting multilevel models in complex survey data with design weights: Recommendations BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009, 9(49): 1-13

Asparouhov T. General Multi-Level Modeling with Sampling Weights Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 2006, 35: 439-460

Examples

# NOT RUN {
data(nhanes_sample)
scale_weights(nhanes_sample, SDMVSTRA, WTINT2YR)

if (require("lme4")) {
  nhanes_sample <- scale_weights(nhanes_sample, SDMVSTRA, WTINT2YR)
  glmer(
    total ~ factor(RIAGENDR) * (log(age) + factor(RIDRETH1)) + (1 | SDMVPSU),
    family = poisson(),
    data = nhanes_sample,
    weights = svywght_a
  )
}
# }

Run the code above in your browser using DataCamp Workspace