dst(x, xi=0, omega=1, alpha=0, nu=Inf, dp=NULL, log=FALSE)
pst(x, xi=0, omega=1, alpha=0, nu=Inf, dp=NULL, method, ...)
qst(p, xi=0, omega=1, alpha=0, nu=Inf, tol=1e-08, dp=NULL, method, ...)
rst(n=1, xi=0, omega=1, alpha=0, nu=Inf, dp=NULL)NAs) are allowed.pst and qst,
it must be of length 1.nu=Inf which corresponds
to the skew-normal distribution.dp is
specified, the individual parameters cannot be set.qsn, measured on the probability scale.0 and 4 which selects
the computing method; see method=0 (default values), an automatic choice is made
among the fouintegrate or pmstdst), probability (pst), quantiles (qst)
and random sample (rst) from the skew-$t$ distribution with given
xi, omega, alpha and nu parameters.pst, and so indirectly of
qst, four different methods are employed.
Method 1 consists in using pmst with dimension d=1.
Method 2 applies integrate to the density function dst.
Method 3 again uses integrate too but with a different integrand,
as given in Section 4.2 of Azzalini & Capitanio (2003), full version of
the paper.
Method 4 consists in the recursive procedure of Jamalizadeh, Khosravi and
Balakrishnan (2009), which is recalled in Complement 4.3 on
Azzalini & Capitanio (2014); the recursion over nu starts from
the explicit expression for nu=1 given by psc.
Of these, Method 1 and 4 are only suitable for integer values of nu.
Method 4 becomes progressively less efficient as nu increases,
because its value corresponds to the number of nested calls, but the
decay of efficiency is slower for larger values of length(x).
If the default argument value method=0 is retained, an automatic choice
among these four methods is made, which depends on the values of nu,
alpha, length(x). The numerical accuracy of methods 1, 2 and 3 can be
regulated via the ... argument, while method 4 is conceptually exact,
up to machine precision.alpha parameter which
regulates skewness; when alpha=0, the skew-$t$ distribution
reduces to the usual Student's $t$ distribution.
When nu=Inf, it reduces to the skew-normal distribution.
When nu=1, it reduces to a form of skew-Cauchy distribution.
See Chapter 4 of Azzalini & Capitanio (2014) for additional information.
A multivariate version of the distribution exists; see dmst.Azzalini, A. with the collaboration of Capitanio, A. (2014). The Skew-normal and Related Families. Cambridge University Press, IMS Monographs series.
Jamalizadeh, A., Khosravi, M., and Balakrishnan, N. (2009). Recurrence relations for distributions of a skew-$t$ and a linear combination of order statistics from a bivariate-$t$. Comp. Statist. Data An. 53, 847--852.
dmst, dsn, dscpdf <- dst(seq(-4, 4, by=0.1), alpha=3, nu=5)
rnd <- rst(100, 5, 2, -5, 8)
q <- qst(c(0.25, 0.50, 0.75), alpha=3, nu=5)
pst(q, alpha=3, nu=5) # must give back c(0.25, 0.50, 0.75)
#
p1 <- pst(x=seq(-3,3, by=1), dp=c(0,1,pi, 3.5))
p2 <- pst(x=seq(-3,3, by=1), dp=c(0,1,pi, 3.5), method=2, rel.tol=1e-9)Run the code above in your browser using DataLab