sommer (version 2.9)

PolyData: Genotypic and Phenotypic data for a potato polyploid population

Description

This dataset contains phenotpic data for 18 traits measured in 187 individuals from a potato diversity panel. In addition contains genotypic data for 221 individuals genotyped with 3522 SNP markers. Please if using this data for your own research cite Rosyara's (2015) publication (see References).

Usage

data("PolyData")

Format

The format is: chr "PolyData"

References

If using this data for your own research please cite:

Rosyara Umesh R., Walter S. De Jong, David S. Douches, Jeffrey B. Endelman. Software for genome-wide association studies in autopolyploids and its application to potato. The Plant Genome 2015.

Covarrubias-Pazaran G (2016) Genome assisted prediction of quantitative traits using the R package sommer. PLoS ONE 11(6): doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156744

See Also

The core functions of the package mmer and mmer2

Examples

# NOT RUN {
####=========================================####
#### For CRAN time limitations most lines in the 
#### examples are silenced with one '#' mark, 
#### remove them and run the examples using
#### command + shift + C |OR| control + shift + C
####=========================================####
data(PolyData)
genotypes <- PolyData$PGeno
phenotypes <- PolyData$PPheno

# ####=========================================####
# ####### convert markers to numeric format
# ####=========================================####
# numo <- atcg1234(data=genotypes, ploidy=4); numo[1:5,1:5]; dim(numo)
# 
# ###=========================================####
# ###### plants with both genotypes and phenotypes
# ###=========================================####
# common <- intersect(phenotypes$Name,rownames(numo))
# 
# ###=========================================####
# ### get the markers and phenotypes for such inds
# ###=========================================####
# marks <- numo[common,]; marks[1:5,1:5]
# phenotypes2 <- phenotypes[match(common,phenotypes$Name),];
# phenotypes2[1:5,1:5]
# 
# ###=========================================####
# ### response variable
# ###=========================================####
# yy.trn <- phenotypes2
# set.seed(1234)
# ww <- sample(1:187,38)
# yy.trn[ww,"tuber_shape"] <- NA
# 
# ###=========================================####
# ###### Additive relationship matrix, specify ploidy
# ###=========================================####
# A <- A.mat(marks, ploidy=4); dim(K1);K1[1:5,1:5]
# D <- D.mat(marks, ploidy=4)
# E <- E.mat(marks, ploidy=4)
# ###=========================================####
# ### run the genomic selection model
# ###=========================================####
# ans <- mmer2(tuber_shape~1, random=~g(Name), 
#              G=list(Name=A), data=yy.trn)
# cor(phenotypes2[ww,"tuber_shape"],ans$fitted.y[ww])
# summary(ans)
# 
# ###=========================================####
# ### run it as GWAS model
# ###=========================================####
# my.map <- PolyData$map
# models <- c("additive","1-dom-alt","1-dom-ref","2-dom-alt","2-dom-ref")
# ans2 <- mmer2(tuber_shape~1, random=~g(Name), models = "additive",
#              G=list(Name=A), W=marks, data=phenotypes2)
# summary(ans2)
# 
# ###=========================================####
# ### compare to GWAS including dominance
# ###=========================================####
# phenotypes2$Named <- phenotypes2$Name
# ans3 <- mmer2(tuber_shape~1, random=~g(Name) + g(Named), models = "additive",
#               G=list(Name=A, Named=D), W=marks, data=phenotypes2)
# summary(ans3)
# }