This function simulates a spatio-temporal ETAS
(Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence) process on a linear network
as a stpm
object.
It is firstly introduced and employed for simulation studies in D'Angelo et al. (2021).
It follows the generating scheme for simulating a pattern from an Epidemic Type Aftershocks-Sequences (ETAS) process (Ogata and Katsura 1988) with conditional intensity function (CIF) as in Adelfio and Chiodi (2020), adapted for the space location of events to be constrained on a linear network.
The simulation on the network is guaranteed by the homogeneous spatial Poisson processes being generated on the network.
rETASlp(
pars = NULL,
betacov = 0.39,
m0 = 2.5,
b = 1.0789,
tmin = 0,
t.lag = 200,
covsim = FALSE,
L,
all.marks = FALSE
)
A stlpm
object
A vector of parameters of the ETAS model to be simulated. See the 'Details' section.
Numerical array. Parameters of the covariates ETAS model
Parameter for the background general intensity of the ETAS model. In the common seismic analyses it represents the threshold magnitude.
1.0789
Minimum value of time.
200
Default FALSE
linear network
Logical value indicating whether to store
all the simulation information as marks in the stlpm
object.
If FALSE
(default option) only the magnitude is returned.
Nicoletta D'Angelo and Marcello Chiodi
The CIF of an ETAS process as in Adelfio and Chiodi (2020) can be written as $$ \lambda_{\theta}(t,\textbf{u}|\mathcal{H}_t)=\mu f(\textbf{u})+\sum_{t_j<t} \frac{\kappa_0 \exp(\eta_j)}{(t-t_j+c)^p} \{ (\textbf{u}-\textbf{u}_j)^2+d \}^{-q} , $$ where
\(\mathcal{H}_t\) is the past history of the process up to time \(t\)
\(\mu\) is the large-scale general intensity
\(f(\textbf{u})\) is the spatial density
\(\eta_j=\boldsymbol{\beta}' \textbf{Z}_j\) is a linear predictor
\(\textbf{Z}_j\) the external known covariate vector, including the magnitude
\(\boldsymbol{\theta}= (\mu, \kappa_0, c, p, d, q, \boldsymbol{\beta})\) are the parameters to be estimated
\(\kappa_0\) is a normalising constant
\(c\) and \(p\) are characteristic parameters of the seismic activity of the given region,
and \(d\) and \(q\) are two parameters related to the spatial influence of the mainshock
In the usual ETAS model for seismic analyses, the only external covariate represents the magnitude, \(\boldsymbol{\beta}=\alpha\), as \(\eta_j = \boldsymbol{\beta}' \textbf{Z}_j = \alpha (m_j-m_0)\), where \(m_j\) is the magnitude of the \(j^{th}\) event and \(m_0\) the threshold magnitude, that is, the lower bound for which earthquakes with higher values of magnitude are surely recorded in the catalogue.
Adelfio, G., and Chiodi, M. (2021). Including covariates in a space-time point process with application to seismicity. Statistical Methods & Applications, 30(3), 947-971.
D’Angelo, N., Adelfio, G., and Mateu, J. (2021). Assessing local differences between the spatio-temporal second-order structure of two point patterns occurring on the same linear network. Spatial Statistics, 45, 100534.
Ogata, Y., and Katsura, K. (1988). Likelihood analysis of spatial inhomogeneity for marked point patterns. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 40(1), 29-39.
set.seed(95)
X <- rETASlp(pars = c(0.1293688525, 0.003696, 0.013362, 1.2,0.424466, 1.164793),
L = chicagonet)
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab