Synthetic dataset comparing serum creatinine measurements from two analytical
methods: an enzymatic method (reference) and the Jaffe colorimetric method.
This is a classic method comparison scenario where the Jaffe method is known
to have positive interference from proteins and other chromogens.
Usage
creatinine_serum
Arguments
Format
A data frame with 80 observations and 3 variables:
sample_id
Character. Unique sample identifier.
enzymatic
Numeric. Creatinine concentration (mg/dL) measured by
the enzymatic method.
jaffe
Numeric. Creatinine concentration (mg/dL) measured by the
Jaffe method.
Details
This synthetic dataset was designed to illustrate well-known patterns in
creatinine method comparisons:
Concentration range: 0.4-8.0 mg/dL, from normal kidney function
to severe chronic kidney disease (CKD)
Bias pattern: Jaffe method shows positive bias, more pronounced
at lower concentrations due to pseudocreatinine interference
Outliers: A few samples show larger positive bias, simulating
interference from bilirubin, hemolysis, or ketones
The enzymatic method is more specific and has largely replaced the Jaffe
method in modern clinical laboratories, though the Jaffe method remains in
use in some settings due to lower reagent costs.
References
Peake M, Whiting M. Measurement of serum creatinine--current status and
future goals. Clin Biochem Rev. 2006;27(4):173-184.