dispindmorisita(x, unique.rm = FALSE, crit = 0.05, na.rm = FALSE)TRUE, unique species (occurring
in only one sample) are removed from the result.NaN) be omitted from the
calculations?imor the
unstandardized Morisita index, mclu the clumpedness index,
muni the uniform index, imst the standardized Morisita
index, pchisq the Chi-squared based probability for the null
hypothesis of random expectation.Imor = n * (sum(xi^2) - sum(xi)) / (sum(xi)^2 - sum(xi))
where $xi$ is the count of individuals in sample $i$, and $n$ is the number of samples ($i = 1, 2, \ldots, n$). $Imor$ has values from 0 to $n$. In uniform (hyperdispersed) patterns its value falls between 0 and 1, in clumped patterns it falls between 1 and $n$. For increasing sample sizes (i.e. joining neighbouring quadrats), $Imor$ goes to $n$ as the quadrat size approaches clump size. For random patterns, $Imor = 1$ and counts in the samples follow Poisson frequency distribution.
The deviation from random expectation (null hypothesis)
can be tested using criticalvalues of the Chi-squared
distribution with $n-1$ degrees of freedom.
Confidence intervals around 1 can be calculated by the clumped
$Mclu$ and uniform $Muni$ indices (Hairston et al. 1971, Krebs
1999) (Chi2Lower and Chi2Upper refers to e.g. 0.025 and 0.975 quantile
values of the Chi-squared distribution with $n-1$ degrees of
freedom, respectively, for crit = 0.05):
Mclu = (Chi2Lower - n + sum(xi)) / (sum(xi) - 1)
Muni = (Chi2Upper - n + sum(xi)) / (sum(xi) - 1)
Smith-Gill (1975) proposed scaling of Morisita index from [0, n] interval into [-1, 1], and setting up -0.5 and 0.5 values as confidence limits around random distribution with rescaled value 0. To rescale the Morisita index, one of the following four equations apply to calculate the standardized index $Imst$:
(a) Imor >= Mclu > 1: Imst = 0.5 + 0.5 (Imor - Mclu) / (n - Mclu),
(b) Mclu > Imor >= 1: Imst = 0.5 (Imor - 1) / (Mclu - 1),
(c) 1 > Imor > Muni: Imst = -0.5 (Imor - 1) / (Muni - 1),
(d) 1 > Muni > Imor: Imst = -0.5 + 0.5 (Imor - Muni) / Muni.
Morisita, M. 1962. Id-index, a measure of dispersion of individuals. Res. Popul. Ecol. 4, 1--7.
Smith-Gill, S. J. 1975. Cytophysiological basis of disruptive pigmentary patterns in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens. II. Wild type and mutant cell specific patterns. J. Morphol. 146, 35--54.
Hairston, N. G., Hill, R. and Ritte, U. 1971. The interpretation of aggregation patterns. In: Patil, G. P., Pileou, E. C. and Waters, W. E. eds. Statistical Ecology 1: Spatial Patterns and Statistical Distributions. Penn. State Univ. Press, University Park.
Krebs, C. J. 1999. Ecological Methodology. 2nd ed. Benjamin Cummings Publishers.
data(dune)
x <- dispindmorisita(dune)
x
y <- dispindmorisita(dune, unique.rm = TRUE)
y
dim(x) ## with unique species
dim(y) ## unique species removedRun the code above in your browser using DataLab