When you write functions that operate on S3 or unclassed objects you can either trust that your inputs will be structured as expected, or tediously check that they are.
vetr
takes the tedium out of structure verification so that you can trust,
but verify. It lets you express structural requirements declaratively with
templates, and it auto-generates human-friendly error messages as needed.
vetr
is written in C to minimize overhead from parameter checks in your
functions. It has no dependencies.
Declare a template that an object should conform to, and let vetr
take care of
the rest:
library(vetr)
tpl <- numeric(1L)
vet(tpl, 1:3)
## [1] "`length(1:3)` should be 1 (is 3)"
vet(tpl, "hello")
## [1] "`\"hello\"` should be type \"numeric\" (is \"character\")"
vet(tpl, 42)
## [1] TRUE
The template concept is based on vapply
, but generalizes to all S3 objects and
adds some special features to facilitate comparison. For example, zero length
templates match any length:
tpl <- integer()
vet(tpl, 1L:3L)
## [1] TRUE
vet(tpl, 1L)
## [1] TRUE
And for convenience short (<= 100 length) integer-like numerics are considered integer:
tpl <- integer(1L)
vet(tpl, 1) # this is a numeric, not an integer
## [1] TRUE
vet(tpl, 1.0001)
## [1] "`1.0001` should be type \"integer-like\" (is \"double\")"
vetr
can compare recursive objects such as lists, or data.frames:
tpl.iris <- iris[0, ] # 0 row DF matches any number of rows in object
iris.fake <- iris
levels(iris.fake$Species)[3] <- "sibirica" # tweak levels
vet(tpl.iris, iris)
## [1] TRUE
vet(tpl.iris, iris.fake)
## [1] "`levels(iris.fake$Species)[3]` should be \"virginica\" (is \"sibirica\")"
From our declared template iris[0, ]
, vetr
infers all the required checks.
In this case, vet(iris[0, ], iris.fake, stop=TRUE)
is equivalent to:
stopifnot_iris <- function(x) {
stopifnot(
is.data.frame(x),
is.list(x),
length(x) == length(iris),
identical(lapply(x, class), lapply(iris, class)),
is.integer(attr(x, 'row.names')),
identical(names(x), names(iris)),
identical(typeof(x$Species), "integer"),
identical(levels(x$Species), levels(iris$Species))
)
}
stopifnot_iris(iris.fake)
## Error in stopifnot_iris(iris.fake): identical(levels(x$Species), levels(iris$Species)) is not TRUE
vetr
saved us typing, and the time and thought needed to come up with what
needs to be compared.
You could just as easily have created templates for nested lists, or data frames
in lists. Templates are compared to objects with the alike
function. For a
thorough description of templates and how they work see the alike
vignette. For template examples see example(alike)
.
Let's revisit the error message:
vet(tpl.iris, iris.fake)
## [1] "`levels(iris.fake$Species)[3]` should be \"virginica\" (is \"sibirica\")"
It tells us:
levels(iris.fake$Species)[3]
vetr
does what it can to reduce the time from error to resolution. The
location of failure is generated such that you can easily copy it in part or
full to the R prompt for further examination.
You can combine templates with &&
/ ||
:
vet(numeric(1L) || NULL, NULL)
## [1] TRUE
vet(numeric(1L) || NULL, 42)
## [1] TRUE
vet(numeric(1L) || NULL, "foo")
## [1] "`\"foo\"` should be `NULL`, or type \"numeric\" (is \"character\")"
Templates only check structure. When you need to check values use .
to
refer to the object:
vet(numeric(1L) && . > 0, -42) # strictly positive scalar numeric
## [1] "`-42 > 0` is not TRUE (FALSE)"
vet(numeric(1L) && . > 0, 42)
## [1] TRUE
You can compose vetting expressions as language objects and combine them:
scalar.num.pos <- quote(numeric(1L) && . > 0)
foo.or.bar <- quote(character(1L) && . %in% c('foo', 'bar'))
vet.exp <- quote(scalar.num.pos || foo.or.bar)
vet(vet.exp, 42)
## [1] TRUE
vet(vet.exp, "foo")
## [1] TRUE
vet(vet.exp, "baz")
## [1] "At least one of these should pass:"
## [2] " - `\"baz\" %in% c(\"foo\", \"bar\")` is not TRUE (FALSE)"
## [3] " - `\"baz\"` should be type \"numeric\" (is \"character\")"
all_bw
is available for value range checks (~10x faster than
isTRUE(all(. >= x & . <= y))
for large vectors):
vet(all_bw(., 0, 1), runif(5) + 1)
## [1] "`all_bw(runif(5) + 1, 0, 1)` is not TRUE (is chr: \"`1.465853` at index 1 not in `[0,1]`\")"
There are a number of predefined vetting tokens you can use in your vetting expressions such as:
vet(NUM.POS, -runif(5)) # positive numeric; see `?vet_token` for others
## [1] "`-runif(5)` should contain only positive values, but has negatives"
Vetting expressions are designed to be intuitive to use, but their
implementation is complex. We recommend you look at example(vet)
for usage
ideas, or at the "Non Standard Evaluation" section of the vignette for the
gory details.
vetr
in FunctionsIf you are vetting function inputs, you can use the vetr
function, which works
just like vet
except that it is streamlined for use within functions:
fun <- function(x, y) {
vetr(numeric(1L), logical(1L))
TRUE # do work...
}
fun(1:2, "foo")
## Error in fun(x = 1:2, y = "foo"): For argument `x`, `length(1:2)` should be 1 (is 2)
fun(1, "foo")
## Error in fun(x = 1, y = "foo"): For argument `y`, `"foo"` should be type "logical" (is "character")
vetr
automatically matches the vetting expressions to the corresponding
arguments and fetches the argument values from the function environment.
See vignette for additional details on how the vetr
function works.
vetr
vignette, ?vet
, ?vetr
, example(vet)
, example(vetr)
.alike
vignette, ?alike
, and example(alike)
for discussion of
templates.vetr
is still in development, although most of the features are considered
mature. The most likely area of change is the treatment of function and
language templates (e.g. alike(sum, max)
), and more flexible treatment of
list templates (e.g. in future lists may be allowed to be different lengths so
long as every named element in the template exists in the object).
install.packages('vetr')
Or for the development version:
# install.packages('devtools')
devtools::install_github('brodieg/vetr@development')
There are many alternatives available to vetr
. We do a survey of the
following in our parameter validation functions review:
stopifnot
by R Corevetr
by Yours Trulyasserthat
by Hadley Wickhamassertive
by Richie Cottoncheckmate
by Michel LangThe following packages also perform related tasks, although we do not review them:
valaddin
v0.1.0 by Eugene Ha, a
framework for augmenting existing functions with validation contracts.
Currently the package is undergoing a major overhaul so we will add it to the
comparison once the new release (v0.3.0) is out.ensurer
v1.1 by Stefan M. Bache, a
framework for flexibly creating and combining validation contracts. The
development version adds an experimental method for creating type safe
functions, but it is not published to CRAN so we do not test it here.validate
by Mark van
der Loo and Edwin de Jonge, with a primary focus on validating data in data
frames and similar data structures.assertr
by Tony Fischetti, also
focused on data validation in data frames and similar structures.types
by Jim Hester, which implements
but does not enforce type hinting.argufy
by Gábor Csárdi, which
implements parameter validation via roxygen tags (not released to CRAN).Thank you to:
all_bw
to
compete with his own package checkmate
.vetr
only worked with function arguments), which I took from
ensurer.Brodie Gaslam is a hobbyist programmer based on the US East Coast.
install.packages('vetr')
typeof()