SemiParBIVProbit object produced by SemiParBIVProbit() and produces some summaries from it.## S3 method for class 'SemiParBIVProbit':
summary(object, n.sim = 100, s.meth = "svd", prob.lev = 0.05,
thrs1 = 0.5, thrs2 = 0.5, cplot = FALSE, ...)SemiParBIVProbit object as produced by SemiParBIVProbit().mvtnorm for
further details.Method = "B".TRUE then a bivariate contour meta plot corresponding to the assumed bivariate model with estimated
association parameter is produced. See documentation of CDVine for details.cplot=TRUE.OR - 1)/(OR + 1), can take values in the range (-1, 1) and does not depend on the marginal probabilities.
Interval is calculated using posterior simulation.Method = "BSS" or Method = "BPO".table.P/table.R.table.P and table.R, it reports the matching rate as percentage.mgcv, based on the results of Marra and Wood (2012), `Bayesian p-values' are returned for the smooth terms. These have
better frequentist performance than their frequentist counterpart. Let $\hat{\bf f}$
and ${\bf V}_f$ denote the vector of values of a smooth term evaluated at the original covariate values and the
corresponding Bayesian covariance matrix, and let ${\bf V}_f^{r-}$ denote
the rank $r$ pseudoinverse of ${\bf V}_f$. The statistic used
is $T=\hat{\bf f}^\prime {\bf V}_f^{r-} \hat{\bf f}$. This is
compared to a chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom given by $r$, which is obtained by
biased rounding of the estimated degrees of freedom. See Marra (2013) for further details. Covariate selection can also be achieved
using a single penalty shrinkage approach as shown in Marra and Wood (2011).
Posterior simulation is used to obtain intervals of nonlinear functions of parameters, such as the odds ratio and
gamma measure discussed by Tajar et al. (2001).
For more details on some of the model summaries see Radice, Marra and Wojtys (submitted).AT, est.prev, SemiParBIVProbitObject, plot.SemiParBIVProbit, predict.SemiParBIVProbit## see examples for SemiParBIVProbitRun the code above in your browser using DataLab